• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Getting in to It "The Fashion Biz"

From another Forum:

Quote:
Originally Posted by codiac2600
Ben you really are an astounding photographer/artist/helpful person lol. These shots you put on this forum are always of such amazing caliber and just makes me want to try and venture into shooting with a model everytime. I have a question if you don't mind and it's in regards to the lens used because I'm in the process of purchasing a few lenses and would love to get such crisp and clear results as yours and would love a basis for my search. Sorry if this isn't thread related by the way .

Thank you again oh and I do have an interesting tidbit to add where you actually came up in a heated arguement with a very ignorant person I met at my place of work which I'd love to share since I have nothing better to do lol. I do a lot of photography for bars/nightclubs here in town (used to be with my pentax Dl but just had to get the K10 w/ vertical grip which has made a major improvement in what I try to do) and as I was walking around when a gentlemen stopped me and asked to see my camera (the K10d) and was happy to let him see it and the next thing I hear is, "Pentax, why would you use this piece of junk" and proceeds to hand the camera back to me with an evil smirk across his face. Normally I'd smack someone for being so rude, but I chose to ask him why he felt the way he did and all that came from it was he was a some other brand fanatic and proposed that no professional photographer uses Pentax. Knowing that I could use my "piece of junk" to bash him over the head I just told him to look you up and see what a real photographer does with junk. Hopefully you get a few more picture views of of this exciting ordeal lol. Well thought that was a funny thing looking back now and just had to share it with you.
First off..I am very proud of you for not "Bashing him in the Head" with your Pentax. Can you imagine the damage you might have done to the lens? Not the body off course, it is too well built.

As to your queries. What I wish to identify here are several points that come together as a composite to finally realize the final single image. Each element is as important as the next and if just one of those elements are too weak, the whole image will fall apart and fail to work.

What you are seeing when you look at an image I am posting, is not just my photo. It is a team of individuals providing their talent (which in general is of the highest calibre in the industry) and expertise to the final outcome. All of these individuals from the Model, Hair and Make-Up artist, Fashion Stylist and PP Retouch (for skin generally..Never my lighting) are essential in getting the "Film Finished" so to speak. Being that I am based in Paris considered one of the three major centers in the world for my metier, I can draw on this exceptional source of talent. These people gravitate to these centers, just as Hollywood attracts actors and actresses, film directors, producers etc.

I have had this discussion with so many very talented photographers who become so frustrated with their work because they cannot produce the images they imagine for lack of the talent needed to do so. They ask, "Ben, why do my images lack something that I can't quite define?" And I brutally have to answer.."They smack of being Provincial..." Anyone who has done this God forsaken business as long as I have can smell it the minute they see the image. Everything from So So model, bad poorly done make-up, abysmal hair, no fashion styling at all or perhaps at best borrowed from a local clothing store and totally out dated by my "Snobbishly Arrogant" standards and really badly overdone or incompetent retouching.

If anyone wishes to do what I do, it is really quite simple. Gain a vocabulary. Go out and look at or buy, Italian Vogue, French Vogue, Citizen K International, Numero, Surface, Issue One, Oyster, Soon, V, etc etc etc..Not the S--Ty mainstream crap. Absorb it, look, observe, look, observe. You must attain a base for even knowing HOW TO OBSERVE and what to look for. DO NOT YET STUDY THE TECHNIQUE!!!That will come later. Look at everything that is happening. Look at the hair the make-up the clothes the model the theme the ambience. Keep doing this over and over and over until you learn how to be "Discerning". To become discerning you need the vocabulary.

Once you've done that and come to the realization that I might want to try this, you can choose a high end provincial market or "THE MARKET"...I started with Toronto, stayed one year, moved to LA to NY to Milan and eventually Paris. You can get some pretty good talent in Chicago, LA as upper echelon almost there markets and get away with it. You can get the good models in Chicago when they come in to do the shows. Chicago have some good model agencies.

Never do a test without all of the "support team" I mentioned. Hair, Make-Up and Fashion-Accessory stylist and of course the Model. "IF YOU DON'T HAVE THIS TEAM YOU WILL BE WASTING YOUR PRECIOUS TIME."

We can talk about how you can and will get a relatively good serious working model and support team for your shoots and what to say to get them. A model agency will know immediately by the questions you ask if you are a novice or advanced shooter. Ask the wrong question and BYE BYE..You'll smack of...OH, just wanna meet models, forget it buddy! Never F--K around with Model agencies. Always be as forthright as you can with them. They can screw your career when it is just starting with just two or three phone calls. When you get to my level, it is the inverse.

Oh yeah...What lenses...Ah I don't give a S--T what I use as long as it gives me what I want to do. But for you I'll recommend these. Depending on your funds I would suggest the 12-24 for wide angle shooting, which I love, stopped down one stop at least. A 28-75 Tamron f2.8, brutally sharp. If you can afford the 40L and 70L lens get it and the 100 Macro by Pentax. I love zoom lenses and 90 percent of my magazine stuff up until Pentax was shot with the 17-40 L by Canon.

Speak Soon
Ben
 

Paul Bestwick

pro member
well Ben one thing is for sure.......as you say "who gives a **** which lens you lose" you could make great images with a frickin coke bottle.
Kudos to you man
Next time I am in Paris I would love to catch up.

Cheers,

Paul
 
OK...Why Not

well Ben one thing is for sure.......as you say "who gives a **** which lens you lose" you could make great images with a frickin coke bottle.
Kudos to you man
Next time I am in Paris I would love to catch up.

Cheers,

Paul

OK...Why Not, your paying....

Take Care
Ben

PS and not at McDonalds
 
OH My God, your from Hobart...

well Ben one thing is for sure.......as you say "who gives a **** which lens you lose" you could make great images with a frickin coke bottle.
Kudos to you man
Next time I am in Paris I would love to catch up.

Cheers,

Paul


Paul, I just realized your from HOBART...I have to tell you a story, nothing to do with photography, but..

Now, everyone is going to think that I am a major loon, but I had a very profound psychic experience related to Port Arthur, Hobart, Tasmania. I will now show you the letter I wrote to Joseph McMoneagle one of the originating founders of SRI's (Stanford research Institut) Stargate program to counter the Russians advances in psychic spying.

Here is the letter and subsequent proof. Please pardon the all upper case format, as at the time I didn't know that it meant I was screaming in internet speak...

HELLO JOSEPH;

I AM A CANADIAN LIVING IN PARIS FRANCE. SINCE BEING ILLUMINATED BY THE BOOK
"EVOLUTION'S END" BY JOSEPH CHILTON PEARCE I BECAME AWARE OF ANOMALIES THAT
OCCURRED IN MY DREAM AND SEMI DREAM STATES. I WISH TO DESCRIBE A FEW OF
THESE TO YOU.

WHEN I WAS LIVING IN THE FRENCH COUNTRY SIDE SPECIFICALLY IN BURGUNDY I HAD
A STRANGE DREAM. I MUST PREFACE THIS EXPERIENCE BY TELLING YOU THAT WE DID
NOT HAVE TELEVISION, ONLY A MONITOR TO VIEW FILMS AND DID NOT HAVE DIRECT
ACCESS TO THE NEWS. MY WIFE WAS IN PARIS DOING A PHOTO SHOOT AND I WAS
ALONE. IN MY DREAM I WAS ON A FERRY CROSSING FROM MAINLAND AUSTRALIA TO
HOBART THE CAPITAL OF TASMANIA. THAT ALONE SEEMED STRANGE IN RETROSPECT.
AS I DEBARKED AT THE PORT OF HOBART THERE WAS AN OUTDOOR CAFÉ. IT WAS VERY
SUNNY AND THERE MUST HAVE BEEN BETWEEN TWENTY TO THIRTY PEOPLE THERE. I
LOOKED IN THE EYES OF SEVERAL OF THE CLIENTS AND FELT PROFOUNDLY THE
AMBIANCE OF THE ENVIRONS.

IN THE NEXT SCENE, I SAW A BLOOD DRENCHED RIVER FILLED WITH BROKEN GLASS
AND DEBRIS.

IN THE NEXT SCENE I WAS SOBBING IN THE PRESENCE OF THE PREMIER OF TASMANIA
WHO WAS A FEMALE. I SAID "HOW COULD SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAPPEN HERE?
WHY...WHY...I DON'T UNDERSTAND...HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE."

I WOKE UP WITH TEARS IN MY EYES. I THOUGHT "WHAT A STRANGE DREAM". I
EVENTUALLY JUST LET IT GO AS A NIGHTMARE. TWO DAYS AFTER THE DREAM MY
AGENT AT THE TIME MEYER HYMAN CALLED ME FROM PARIS. THE FIRST WORDS THAT
LITERALLY CAME OUT OF HIS MOUTH WERE THE FOLLOWING ; "DID YOU HEAR
WHAT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA?" IMMEDIATELY MY HAIR STOOD ON END AND I SAID;
"DON'T TELL ME, LET ME SHARE A DREAM I HAD WITH YOU" AND I WENT ON TO TELL
HIM OF MY EXPERIENCE. AFTER HEARING THE STORY HE SAID; "THAT'S AMAZING
BEN,
"TODAY, A MAN WENT BERSERK AND SHOT AND KILLED SEVERAL PEOPLE AND INJURED
MANY MORE IN AN OUTDOOR CAFÉ IN HOBART, TASMANIA.

THANKS FOR YOUR PRECIOUS TIME
REGARDS
BENJAMIN KANAREK
THE TEEM PRODUCTIONS
PARIS, FRANCE

Thank you for spending some of your time in listening to what I had to say
in regards to what I believe was a dream state remote viewing experience.

>>You're welcome.

If you could kindly suggest to me how I might be able to develop this
capacity further it would be of great help to me.

>>As I've tried to explain in many of my books and writting, etc., there is
probably no way to improve the ability. which is why I've always tried to
stay away from the subject of training. When I get into it, all I ever do is
piss people off. Evidence shows that the degree of skill usually
demonstrated by someone walking in the door is about the level of skill that
can be expected forever for that person. People who go around telling people
they can train them and make them better at being psychic [or doing RV] are
simply lying to them. They usually take someone who has never experienced
RV, run them through a training course at around $3 to $4K, and then have
them demonstrate they can do RV. then they tell them to go off and practice
and they will get better. It doesn't happen, except perhaps in the rarest of
cases. In reality, you can take that same person and have them demonstrate
their RV expertise when they walk in the door without training and they will
do just as good from the beginning. It's the whole training idea that's
bogus. I try to share what I know about RV in my book REMOTE VIEWING
SECRETS, in order to save people money and pain. But, everyone thinks that
I'm just being elitist when I tell them what they are capable of at the
start is about what they will always be capable of. Again, evidence
demonstrates that about 1/2 of one percent of any general population will
ever be world class in RV. So, normally; the other 99.5% will be able to do
RV, but at a much reduced ability level. There are exceptions of course. In
the case that you may be an exception, the simple truth of the matter is you
need to "practice." Practice, practice, practice, and then when you can't
stand it any longer, practice some more. It really is like a Martial Art. It
has to become second nature.

Again if you are ever in Paris please do not hesitate to give me a call and
it would be a pleasure to be your guide while in Paris.

>>I do appreciate that. If or when my wife and I are in your area, we will
make a point of contacting you.

Be well Benjamin,
Joe

Hobart, Tasmania Shooting Rampage; Worst Massacre in Australia
Special Report by Jeremy Zakis

28/04/1996-04:16a.m. (CDT)
To EmergencyNet News Services,

More news has now come in about the Shooting Massacre in Hobart, Tasmania:

The shooting occurred around mid-afternoon at the Historic Tourist attraction of Port Arthur near Hobart. Initial reports were that a person had been locked in the boot of a burning car. Followed by reports of a man with a high powered rifle shooting at people.

After shooting several people at Port Arthur, the man made his way 2 Kilometers up the road to the 'Fox and Hound Resort' where he opened fire again. He then escaped to the Seaside Guest House where he is presently.

According to Television Channel's Nine and Seven, the toll is now at least 25 people dead and 15 others are wounded. A seige is now in progress around a Seaside Guest House where the man is believed to be holding hostages and shooting at helicopters.

About 200 police are in the area with Special Task Forces on the scene and all roads and tracks are sealed around the seige area. All available helicopters are being used to ferry the injured to hospital. It has been confirmed that this is now Australia's worst massacre in it's history.

I will keep you posted whenever more reports become available.

Regards
Jeremy Zakis
(Adelaide, South Australia)

28/04/1996 - 06:24a.m. CDT
To EmergencyNet News Service,

Here is the latest on the Tasmanian Massacre as of 9:15pm Tasmanian Local Time:

It has been confirmed that 25 people have been killed and that 17 people have been badly wounded so far. Among the dead are children including a baby. Unconfirmed reports say that some of the victims were incinerated in a car as the gunman set cars and buildings alight.

The gunman has been described as a young 'surfie' type with blonde hair and that just prior to the shooting, had been chatting freely at a kiosk.

According to Tasmanian Police Commission John Johnson, the weapon used by the gunman is 'presumably an automatic'. And that at this point in time, negotiators are talking by phone with the man. It is possible that he may have three or more hostages inside the guest house. It has been reported that he has fired shots at police from the house.

Police have now cordoned off the township and according to Commissioner Johnson, it would be 'Very difficult to escape' from the guest house.

Police forces in Victoria and New South Wales have been called for assistance to help resolve the situation.

Regards,
Jeremy Zakis
(Adelaide, South Australia)

28/04/1996 -08:42a.m. CDT
To EmergencyNet News Service,

The death toll in todays massacre at Port Arthur Tourist attraction has been confirmed at more than 30. Police are continuing to find more bodies in the dark as they search the area. 18 people remain in hospital at this point in time with 4 on the critical list, 4 in a serious condition and 10 in a satisfactory condition.

It appears the gunman was purposely looking to kill tourists. One witness has stated that the gunman said 'There are a lot of wasps around here today, there's not many Japs here are there?' then he muttered something before moving into the Kiosk and started the shooting at around 3:30pm. It appears the gunman moved outside after that and started shooting at the tourist buses killing 2 or 3 on each plus a driver, before making his way to the "Fox and Hound Resort" in a rental car according to witnesses. An unconfirmed report also says that at this time the gunman also forced some hostages into the boot (Trunk) of a car and locked them in. Then he apparently set the car alight burning them to death.

He then opened fire at the resort killing several more before he and his three hostages were pursued by police through thick vegetation to the guest house. Negotiations are continuing but police are almost certain that he has several semi-automatic weapons with enough ammunition to hold police at bay for hours.

Australian Prime Minister, Mr John Howard, has released a statement calling it "a shocking and senseless act". The Tasmanian Police Commissioner made a direct appeal to the gunman a short while ago using the nations television services calling for him to give himself in as he has already done enough damage.

At 10:35pm tonight it was reported that police believe the death toll may now be more than 40 as more and more bodies are found. The gunman continues to fire at anything that moves near the guest house while police continue to negotiate over the phone.

Special News Bulletins are continuing to bring news as it happens but it appears the seige may take hours to be resolved.

-That will be all from me for tonight as I need to get some sleep. I hope that my reports have been of some use even though they may seem a bit hastily typed up. Due to limited source access most of the reports have been made up from television reports on all the Australian Networks but hopefully this gives you some idea of the events that unfolded in Tasmania today. I shall try to send some more reports tommorrow as more events unfold.

Regards,
-Jeremy Zakis
(Adelaide, South Australia)
dainis@mtc.bns.com.au

ENN would like to publically thank Mr. Jeremy Zakis for his on-going coverage of this developing story and sharing it with us. Mr. Zakis' coverage is an example of one of the best uses of the Internet and a vital sharing of information as it happens.

(c) Mr. Zakis and EmergencyNet News, 1996, All Rights Reserved.
 
Top