View Single Post
Old April 21st, 2013, 01:35 PM
Jerome Marot Jerome Marot is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Munich, Germany.
Posts: 3,833

Originally Posted by Asher Kelman View Post
stick to my contention that one has to accept layers of art existing. That art starts with the export of an imagined set of feelings and esthetics into, (or onto), a new, (or existing physical form), designed to evoke a range of emotional feelings and or reflections by the visitor to it.
You're far too serious for this discussion. Let's see: how would you define art? My definition is quite simple: art is what is produced by an artist. You'll recognise it because it hangs in a museum or because the artist has silly clothes and a résumé written in gibberish. It is a definition that works for most practical purposes. What is yours?
Reply With Quote