Not so long ago, like many on this forum, I suspect, I was scanning in all my transparencies and negs. My darkroom is boxed in the garage and, at 75, I have no intention of ever un-boxing it all. So I needed to decide which trans/negs to scan before packing away for posterity and which to simply dump.
My criteria were.
As a piece of artwork...
It should, somehow, SAY something
OR
It should ask some QUESTION of the viewer
OR
It can SHOW something unusual in its own right.
If not art, it can constitute a simple record of fact
(I think these criteria would include Don McCullen's war photography, Cartier-Bresson's captured moments, Ansel Adams' landscapes... and I think, your space. )
Unfortunately, when I was scanning all my film stuff, most of it satisfied none of the criteria and was junked. Very few satisfied the 'artwork' criteria and the rest were Photos of people and thus simply records. I found most photos of places were junked; if I had a photo of some trees and a lake in Africa - but not an artwork...junk.
I wonder how many others (non-professional) find a resonance with their own experience?
PS. DOUG - imho your space simply asks questions, whilst making a statement about framing.