Open Photography Forums  
HOME FORUMS NEWS FAQ SEARCH

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > UV/IR Thermal or Xray Photography

UV/IR Thermal or Xray Photography Humans happen to use visible light naturally but now we can go beyond the usual wavelengths we appreciate, to find out more about our world and ourselves.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 12th, 2010, 03:33 PM
Dr Klaus Schmitt Dr Klaus Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Posts: 1,189
Default "The Rose!"

Yes, this is a red russian rose, and it is not shot in visible light.



Last edited by Dr Klaus Schmitt; July 12th, 2010 at 04:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 12th, 2010, 05:01 PM
Rachel Foster Rachel Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 3,574
Default

Klaus, if I may, what were your goals in this shot?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 12th, 2010, 05:35 PM
Dr Klaus Schmitt Dr Klaus Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Posts: 1,189
Default

To show the invisible beauty that is hidden from our human eyes or to put it differently, to open up our perception,
that even a tiny insect may be able to see something we will never be able to see with our limited senses.

This is a shot using ultraviolet light only and a soft focus lens.
__________________
Klaus
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/ my normal photographic work
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my ultraviolet (UV) work
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 12th, 2010, 05:40 PM
Rachel Foster Rachel Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 3,574
Default

I like the idea but I think it lacks something you were trying to capture. I wish I could pinpoint what that was but it eludes me.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 12th, 2010, 06:10 PM
Dr Klaus Schmitt Dr Klaus Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Posts: 1,189
Default

I noticed in my exhibits that some have an issue with that "unnatural"
color of that rose. This "it can't be" hinders sometimes viewers to enjoy.
Maybe it is that....? Unfortunately you can't see the 3ft x 3ft print which
shows the velvety structure of the petals.
__________________
Klaus
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/ my normal photographic work
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my ultraviolet (UV) work
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old July 12th, 2010, 06:51 PM
Rachel Foster Rachel Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 3,574
Default

I don't think so. I'm not sure what it is, but it doesn't stand out. It's pretty but lacks the wow factor.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 12th, 2010, 07:05 PM
Dr Klaus Schmitt Dr Klaus Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Posts: 1,189
Default

Well, it is the one which draws in the most visitors strange enough
__________________
Klaus
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/ my normal photographic work
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my ultraviolet (UV) work
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old July 12th, 2010, 08:14 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34,782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Klaus Schmitt View Post
Yes, this is a red russian rose, and it is not shot in visible light.





Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, 1600



JULIET

'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet
;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.


Klaus,

Shakespeare considered a rose would be the same no matter what! For us too, the Rose is the sum gestalt all the wonderful roses we've experienced: the red ones that lovers give, the ones on funeral caskets, the white one's in the jacket of a dandy, a garland, all and more make up our ideas of a rose.

Your rose is not anything Shakespeare would have considered. It's observed differently in a parallel universe. We could call it Heaven Night Flower for it really seems to be part of a night sky.


Rachel,

This is no rose you have even sniffed!
This is the giant dark magenta state of being that insects inhabit.
We do not sniff as the insects do.
We do not have compound eyes as they do.
Each petal to them is a giant mass to explore.
What we do see is certainly divorced from the usual assumptions we have.
Even William Shakespeare would not recognize this as a rose but rather something from some herb garden of a witch from a cave in the bowels of the earth.

So what you are missing is everything! That's the idea, I think of looking at things in new ways. It's this which allows us, from time to time to obtain insights otherwise closed to us.

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old July 12th, 2010, 08:52 PM
Rachel Foster Rachel Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 3,574
Default

Oh I agree it's pretty.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old July 12th, 2010, 10:54 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34,782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel Foster View Post
Oh I agree it's pretty.
Oh Rachel, I just knew you'd come around! After all, who can resist Romeo's Orphelia?

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old July 13th, 2010, 02:55 AM
Dr Klaus Schmitt Dr Klaus Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Posts: 1,189
Default

Thanks for these nice words. Yes, "a rose is a rose is a rose" in this or parallel universes. From that same series and color adjusted to match the original color (don't forget that it is a monochromatic shot as UV has no "color").

__________________
Klaus
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/ my normal photographic work
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my ultraviolet (UV) work
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old July 13th, 2010, 11:36 AM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34,782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Klaus Schmitt View Post
Thanks for these nice words. Yes, "a rose is a rose is a rose" in this or parallel universes. From that same series and color adjusted to match the original color (don't forget that it is a monochromatic shot as UV has no "color").

Beautiful, but does that velvet appearance come through with visble light?

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old July 13th, 2010, 12:19 PM
Dr Klaus Schmitt Dr Klaus Schmitt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Posts: 1,189
Default

Not to that extent. UV light is about 1.6x shorter in wavelength, so this is also the increase factor in resolution (roughly) - the reason why the chipmaking industry started with lenses for green light (546nm) and now over the decades works with excimer lasers and special quartz fluorite lenses for deep UV "light" up to 193nm (factor 2.8x compared to green light).
__________________
Klaus
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/ my normal photographic work
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my ultraviolet (UV) work
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Challenge: Your finest pictures only: "The Beautiful Lake in Landscape" collection" Nathaniel Alpert Themes 73 April 1st, 2013 06:08 AM
"The Photographer as Aggressor" Shane Carter Layback Cafe 17 February 29th, 2008 10:08 PM
Birds in Flight - "The Wimberley Years" John Harper Wildlife 2 August 13th, 2007 05:15 AM
"The technology assets of Pixmantec ApS have been acquired by Adobe" sidfrisby Image Processing and Workflow 97 July 13th, 2006 06:08 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 AM.


Posting images or text grants license to OPF, yet of such remain with its creator. Still, all assembled discussion 2006-2017 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved) Posts with new theme or unusual image might be moved/copied to a new thread!