Simon Tindemans
New member
Hello all,
As most of you will undoubtedly know, neither one of the big browsers on the Windows platform (Explorer, Firefox) supports color management. A few months ago, Apple presented a Windows port Safari, its color managed browser, so I decided to give it a try for my photo-related browsing.
At first glance, everything seemed to work fine. For example, the tests on this page (click) indicated no obvious problems. However, I noticed a slight difference in rendering between Photoshop/Lightroom and the browser. Also, when looking my own web site with sRGB images, there was no discernible difference between Safari and Firefox.
From this and other test I have concluded that Safari has only partial support for color management. It recognizes and honors embedded profiles, but it does not transform all images to the monitor space. Instead, every image is transformed to sRGB. Hence, there is an implicit assumption that every monitor is sRGB (wrong). It also means that, for sRGB images, Safari is no better than a 'stupid' browser.
So far, I have only verified this behavior on my own machine, so the appearance of the bug could still be related to my configuration (WinXP MCE with MS color applet installed, Optix XR profile). Can anyone with access to a color-managed Windows machine verify this behavior on another machine? More detailed information on the type of tests I performed can be found in http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1007179
Thanks in advance!
Simon
As most of you will undoubtedly know, neither one of the big browsers on the Windows platform (Explorer, Firefox) supports color management. A few months ago, Apple presented a Windows port Safari, its color managed browser, so I decided to give it a try for my photo-related browsing.
At first glance, everything seemed to work fine. For example, the tests on this page (click) indicated no obvious problems. However, I noticed a slight difference in rendering between Photoshop/Lightroom and the browser. Also, when looking my own web site with sRGB images, there was no discernible difference between Safari and Firefox.
From this and other test I have concluded that Safari has only partial support for color management. It recognizes and honors embedded profiles, but it does not transform all images to the monitor space. Instead, every image is transformed to sRGB. Hence, there is an implicit assumption that every monitor is sRGB (wrong). It also means that, for sRGB images, Safari is no better than a 'stupid' browser.
So far, I have only verified this behavior on my own machine, so the appearance of the bug could still be related to my configuration (WinXP MCE with MS color applet installed, Optix XR profile). Can anyone with access to a color-managed Windows machine verify this behavior on another machine? More detailed information on the type of tests I performed can be found in http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1007179
Thanks in advance!
Simon