• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

LOMO Helios 40-2 f1.5 85mm (1978)

Dr Klaus Schmitt

Well-known member
Got a 2nd one from 1978, talk a quick walk with it on Panasonic GH4, all at f1.5

Yep, autumn is on its way here...

44212766262_40e09f2c72_o.jpg


29325533347_80afb510d6_o.jpg


29325534157_9700c1fcbf_o.jpg


29325536647_e9a5e4bb20_o.jpg


29325542967_35cefbeb9a_o.jpg


29325542767_5ee6db94ba_o.jpg


Full set is here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums/72157700279057394
 

Dr Klaus Schmitt

Well-known member
Yes, I used it deliberately open at f1.5 to see how it paints then. It shows some glow which disappears if stopped down to f2, gets very sharp then.

See open here:

44261192131_00487061dd_o.jpg


stopped down here:

44261192051_e0e7d712b2_o.jpg
 
Wow, what a totally different feel (almost dreamy). The first image has some chromatic aberration in the upper LHS along the dark edges where it is bright (that happens to me some times as well). Is it from the post processing or perhaps the RAW conversion?
 

Dr Klaus Schmitt

Well-known member
Wow, what a totally different feel (almost dreamy). The first image has some chromatic aberration in the upper LHS along the dark edges where it is bright (that happens to me some times as well). Is it from the post processing or perhaps the RAW conversion?

It is this older lens Steve which shows quite some CA in high contrast areas.
 
Top