-
Please use real names.
Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed
Firstname Lastname
Register
We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know! -
Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!
Mark Hampton
New member
Asher,
the best suggestion yet is two sliding boxes; one inside the other. I am looking to build it this summer.
Bart - its so bloody heavy that it feels like the camera is a bit part to the lens.
cheers
fahim mohammed
Well-known member
Maybe, but probably not!
In any case I have never felt inadequate with my 50mm. Neither have others.
In mm or weight.
Just for the record, I currently can extend from 35mm to 100mm. Depending on the situation.
What's on your mind? Or why do you ask?
Regards.
In any case I have never felt inadequate with my 50mm. Neither have others.
In mm or weight.
Just for the record, I currently can extend from 35mm to 100mm. Depending on the situation.
What's on your mind? Or why do you ask?
Regards.
Luis Gonzalez
New member
800mm F/5.6 and 1500mm F/4.5
OK - the second one is actually a telescope with a 13" primary mirror and not something I can take on a hike, but it still counts as a "lens"
Actually, the 800/5.6 isn't something I really take on a hike much, either.
But the question didn't say anything about portability.
OK - the second one is actually a telescope with a 13" primary mirror and not something I can take on a hike, but it still counts as a "lens"
Actually, the 800/5.6 isn't something I really take on a hike much, either.
But the question didn't say anything about portability.