Asher Kelman
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
My 70-200 4.0 fits into a pocket, is light and yet impressive looking and gives the quality of the 70-200 2.8 L IS which I use for photography of actors on my sets and portraits.
On a tripod, the weight of the 2.8L IS makes no difference to me.
Hand held, the larger lens gets to be heavy after several hours but I like the IS.
So for this work, now, how many portrait photographers would choose the much lighter 70-200 4.0L IS?
Asher
On a tripod, the weight of the 2.8L IS makes no difference to me.
Hand held, the larger lens gets to be heavy after several hours but I like the IS.
So for this work, now, how many portrait photographers would choose the much lighter 70-200 4.0L IS?
Asher