Michael Nagel
Well-known member
This is an observation which could be easily put down with a lot of numbers and equations, but I try to keep this as brief and simple as possible.
Common wisdom:
Cameras with small sensors are always bad at low light situations.
Cameras with larger sensors are better in this case.
My observation (Doug could put this better in numbers and equations than me) is that in the case you are looking for a larger DoF at low light while preserving conveniently short exposure times, you are better off with a camera that has a small sensor and a wide-aperture lens. While keeping the advantage of the large aperture helping to keep the ISO setting low and the DoF is larger thanks to the smaller sensor compared to 36x24mm or other large sensors.
Of course - if you want to have small DoF, you need the larger sensor - this is a special case.
I think it is useful to be more use-case oriented and choose the tools accordingly.
Something to ponder...
Best regards,
Michael
Common wisdom:
Cameras with small sensors are always bad at low light situations.
Cameras with larger sensors are better in this case.
My observation (Doug could put this better in numbers and equations than me) is that in the case you are looking for a larger DoF at low light while preserving conveniently short exposure times, you are better off with a camera that has a small sensor and a wide-aperture lens. While keeping the advantage of the large aperture helping to keep the ISO setting low and the DoF is larger thanks to the smaller sensor compared to 36x24mm or other large sensors.
Of course - if you want to have small DoF, you need the larger sensor - this is a special case.
I think it is useful to be more use-case oriented and choose the tools accordingly.
Something to ponder...
Best regards,
Michael