If you want 8x10 then your options become much more limited. For lower budgets and volume, you have Kodak, Mitsubishi, Olympus and Sony.
I have heard that Olympus has discontinued their 8x10 dyesub (p-440). Sony has the UPD70A and Mitusbishi has the 3020DU both of which run for close to a $1000. The most popular option in the US is the Kodak 1400. It is much cheaper than the Sony and Mitsubishi and the support is excellent (in the US at least). One area of complain that I hear of with the Kodak dye subs is that they are weaker in the reds than the other dye sub manufacturers. I believe it is stronger in yellows though.
None of the dye subs above though directly support smaller sizes. You have to print on a 8x10 or 8x12 sheet of paper and then trin the prints. So for example you could print 4 4x6s on a 8x12 sheet and then trim. Obviously this is a bit of a problem if you just want 1 4x6.
If you are looking for high voulme then you need a roll type dye sub which are much more expensive. Kodak has the 9810 and there is the Shinko S1245 oth of which run in the $3000+ range. There is also the Kodak ML-500 which is $10,000+. These are the only dye subs that I know of that support 8x10.
I personally use a Mitsubishi CP9000DW. It is only for 4x6s and 3.5x5s. The 9550 only goes to 6x9. Most roll type dye subs max out at 6x8 or 6x9 with the 4 listed above as the only ones supporting 8x10.
Rob.Martin said:
I've been looking around at Dye Sub (and in Asia apart from the proliferation of 6x4's there's nothing) and was wondering what anyone would recommend in this area. Looking for 8x10 max. But ability to do smaller if necessary. Not a lot of chatter about these printers exists. I know about the Olympus and Kodaks but there's a dearth of info about any of them
Thoughts??
Rob