• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

More metal

Another, similar metal part. The approach here was different. I tried to make the metal as smooth and silky as possible, but added specular highlights to remind the viewer that it's metal.

IMG_2995.jpg


Canon 30D Ef-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro @ f/16 1/200 ISO 100

One 24 X 36 softbox overhead and one strobe w/ 20deg honeycomb grid off camera right to create the highlights in the threads.
 

Ray West

New member
Hi Charles,

I think that may be more like the machinist wanted to see it, but I guess only he can say. There are a few odd points I see, but that is more likely to do with my monitor, etc.

One thing that struck me, is if he is designing these in a cad program of some sort, it should be easy for him to produce rendered drawings, and thus do you out of a job ;-)

Best wishes,

Ray
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Charels,

Since this thread also included technic, I might suggest to add a component which removes it from the technical to the artistic and paints with light. In addition to Doug's point on bringing out the geometery of the lines of the threads, I would suggest bold shadows on a lighter background. Now, of course this may be counter to your idea, just my particular approach.

Asher
 
@Ray, yes these parts come from NC machining, and often nice renderings exist. But a rendering does not accurately represent the material etc. Besides, M.C.Escher showed that things can be drawn (and rendered) that cannot be made to exist.

The machinist is interested in photos of the parts themselves, and I'm interested in photography, not CAD drafting (something I've had some experience with).

@Asher, I deliberately approached this project from a "product photography" point of view, rather than an "art photography" one. I will, no doubt produce some more "arty" pictures of these objects (I already have a macro series in mind for one piece), but only when the "work" is done.

@Doug, yes I would like to see them larger and softer also, but don't have a suitable modifier (i.e., small softbox). I also wanted the hard specular quality of the light for the highlights, so didn't try a larger source.

Thanks all for your suggestions.
 
And, so far the client likes them a lot. He has had suggestions for a couple. One we didn't get a chance to reshoot because he sold it... But in general we are both happy with the results.

Thanks Rachel and Joe
 
Top