• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Just for Fun No C&C will be given: Intense laddie

Jim Galli

Member
KyleS.jpg

kyle​

...on my back patio.

If any interest, there are some pages of other things done with this antique lens. I've been having a ball with it.
 

Cem_Usakligil

Well-known member
Hi Jim,

A very intense look indeed, family I presume? When I look at the picture as a whole, I like it. The tonality, composition, blur; it all works well for me. The only nit I can pick is the placement of the focus on his left eye (the one on the right-hand-side for the lookers). My mind would be more at ease if it was his other eye which was in focus but this is a very small nit to pick :)
Thanks for sharing. What camera/lens?

Cheers,
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
A wonderful present for us!

Jim, when you come in, we always get to see a treat. Now Kyle is showing he has some spunk and I like that. He comes through all that softness well represented in the way his face is built into the tones and then there are lips and cheek and a look that is compelling.

I do have one niggle too, LOL!. What's that on his nose? Looks like a highlight or shine from using some bright hard light. But maybe that's also the way he is and without it it would not be him. So ignore my little niggle!

Asher
 

Jim Galli

Member
Thanks Cem. Family friend. I used the 5X7 Speed Graphic and an 1860 BLL & Co. landscape meniscus lens that just has a look to it that I love. Film was Foma 100.
 

Jim Galli

Member
Hi Asher. Open shade. No other light but a waning afternoon. And the look is real. He had his mouth open for a previous shot and I told him to close his mouth and try not to look bored. So he did.
 
Thanks Cem. Family friend. I used the 5X7 Speed Graphic and an 1860 BLL & Co. landscape meniscus lens that just has a look to it that I love. Film was Foma 100.

Hi Jim,

Interesting shot, intense look indeed. But for a 5x7 downsampled to this size, surely there should be something in focus? Is it the downsampling method you used?

Just wondering.
Bart
 

Jim Galli

Member
Hi Jim,

Interesting shot, intense look indeed. But for a 5x7 downsampled to this size, surely there should be something in focus? Is it the downsampling method you used?

Just wondering.
Bart
Hi Bart.

No, the soft focus is by purpose. The 1859 BLL Co. is a single meniscus doplet and wide open it is quite soft. That was my intent. It is an acquired taste. Jim
 
Hi Bart.

No, the soft focus is by purpose. The 1859 BLL Co. is a single meniscus doplet and wide open it is quite soft. That was my intent. It is an acquired taste. Jim

Hi Jim,

I'm not trying to argue for the sake of it, but there's a difference between soft-focus and out-of-focus.

IMHO the image would gain by (obviously) maintaining the soft-focus look, yet have a more focused look at one of the eyes. Human vision needs something in focus to allow the eye to return to after scanning the image and savouring the atmosphere.

BTW, I'm not unfamiliar with optics in general, and I know what to expect of a meniscus doublet (focus, but still lots of spherical aberration, compared to more complex optical formulations). To me it seems there's another issue taking away from the potential.

Bart
 
Top