Asher Kelman
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
In a move that crumbles required trust in the most revered health verifying institutes worldwide, The Trump administration fabricated (purely political) guidelines they inserted, (despite’s scientist vigorous objection) falsely asserting “Non-Necessity of Testing Asymptomatic Persons” in the goal of preventing the spread of the virus causing COVID-19
The C.D.C. headquarters in Atlanta. Officials said the agency’s parent organization, the Department of Health and Human Services, inserted guidance on the C.D.C. website over its scientists’ strenuous objections.
Credit...Audra Melton for The New York Times
By Apoorva Mandavilli
A heavily criticized recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month about who should be tested for the coronavirus was not written by C.D.C. scientists and was posted to the agency’s website despite their serious objections, according to several people familiar with the matter as well as internal documents obtained by The New York Times.
The guidance said it was not necessary to test people without symptoms of Covid-19 even if they had been exposed to the virus. It came at a time when public health experts were pushing for more testing rather than less, and administration officials told The Times that the document was a C.D.C. product and had been revised “with input from the agency’s director, Dr. Robert Redfield.“
But officials told The Times this week that the health department did the rewriting itself and then “dropped” it into the C.D.C.’s public website, flouting the agency’s strict scientific review process.
“That was a doc that came from the top down, from the H.H.S. and the task force,” said a federal official with knowledge of the matter, referring to the White House task force on the coronavirus. “That policy does not reflect what many people at the C.D.C. feel should be the policy.”
The C.D.C. headquarters in Atlanta. Officials said the agency’s parent organization, the Department of Health and Human Services, inserted guidance on the C.D.C. website over its scientists’ strenuous objections.
Credit...Audra Melton for The New York Times
By Apoorva Mandavilli
- Sept. 17, 2020, 6:07 p.m. ET
A heavily criticized recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month about who should be tested for the coronavirus was not written by C.D.C. scientists and was posted to the agency’s website despite their serious objections, according to several people familiar with the matter as well as internal documents obtained by The New York Times.
The guidance said it was not necessary to test people without symptoms of Covid-19 even if they had been exposed to the virus. It came at a time when public health experts were pushing for more testing rather than less, and administration officials told The Times that the document was a C.D.C. product and had been revised “with input from the agency’s director, Dr. Robert Redfield.“
But officials told The Times this week that the health department did the rewriting itself and then “dropped” it into the C.D.C.’s public website, flouting the agency’s strict scientific review process.
“That was a doc that came from the top down, from the H.H.S. and the task force,” said a federal official with knowledge of the matter, referring to the White House task force on the coronavirus. “That policy does not reflect what many people at the C.D.C. feel should be the policy.”