• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Dual portrait

142595779-L.jpg
 

Antonio Correia

Well-known member
Nikolai.
I like the concept and the ideia.

I think the photo is very well done as usual but the background seems a bit distracting because it is not unifrom :)

Just an opinion :)
Cheers
 

Kathy Rappaport

pro member
Nik,

The lower right of the outside one. The background was not lit - not a problem, but there is a shadow and then the lower corner just looks like light fall off that was uneven to me.
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Hi Nikolai,

Again, congratulations. You constantly look to new areas to test your skills. I like the approach and the growth. This idea of frame in frame is not new, but here I know it's personal.

If you wanted the b.g. of the framed picture to continue in the b.g. of the live image then the shadows and the colors should match. However, that may not be your vision. If that were the case, then I would offer that the colors should be contrasting or complimentary.

The brown hues and the blue hues of the two b.g.s don't go well together in my mind.

So do we want to see an integrated image?

You can readily examine these points and I wonder which of these possibilities you might prefer if you did that?

Still, I'd be proud of the picture. This is the kind of project that is very worthwhile for everyone who wonders about new lenses or more megapixels to emulate. It's the struggle to bring off a concept from one's mind that counts in photography. Nothing else.

Asher
 
Asher,

Hi Nikolai,

Again, congratulations. You constantly look to new areas to test your skills. I like the approach and the growth. This idea of frame in frame is not new, but here I know it's personal.

Thanks!:)

Asher Kelman said:
If you wanted the b.g. of the framed picture to continue in the b.g. of the live image then the shadows and the colors should match. However, that may not be your vision. If that were the case, then I would offer that the colors should be contrasting or complimentary.
The brown hues and the blue hues of the two b.g.s don't go well together in my mind.
No, I didn't want the BGs to be the same. However, I wanted each one to match its FG subject, hence the framed bg is shifted toards magenta (at least on my monitor:) to match the dress.

This picture was one of the ideas for dgrin's "irregular" challenge, hence I didn't go for classic color combinations, poses, etc. I didn't have a lot of choice, but if you get a feeling of a disturbance of a sort - I got what I wanted:)


Asher Kelman said:
So do we want to see an integrated image?
I'm not sure I understand..:-( "Integrated" in what sense?

Asher Kelman said:
You can readily examine these points and I wonder which of these possibilities you might prefer if you did that?

Still, I'd be proud of the picture. This is the kind of project that is very worthwhile for everyone who wonders about new lenses or more megapixels to emulate. It's the struggle to bring off a concept from one's mind that counts in photography. Nothing else.

Asher

Thank you again!

I'm not a lens hog (oh well, who am I kidding? I am a poorly funded lens hog:), and at the time I have a nice lineup which allows me to do pretty much anything I want except macro, birding and astro. So I'm trying to explore what I can with what I have. I should say that these intense two week challenges are extremely... challenging, especially since I'm not going to beat somebody else (well, that too:), but to beat my own self, do something I can be at least glad with, if not proud of.

What I miss the most is a decent size studio... My common room is nice, but it's not enough size wise. Forget about taking portraits with 85mm (or longer). I'm glad if I can use 50 :-(

Anyway...

Here's another one for you :). This one is supposed to be "picturesque".

Morning Radiance, 6am

142560011-O-1.jpg


Cheers, my friend! :)
 
Top