Yes, Fahim! What you report shocks me. I had no idea of this.Steve's coin was his integrity as a photojournalist
and documentary photographer.
Well, what is the problem with the accused Cubapicture?
Did he change something really relevant? No.
Wow! I'm not sure what "no manipulation" means?Where to draw the line - which manipulation is OK?
For me there is no acceptable manipulation of the picture as the maniplulation of the viewer can be subtle...
I think you know pretty well.So I have some problems accepting your rather absolute dictum.
But I know what you mean.
No, actually I don't.
Oh, of course. That's why I hate to see you say (emphasis added): "For me there is no acceptable manipulation of the picture as the maniplulation of the viewer can be subtle..."I think you know pretty well.
It is difficult to draw a line.
But where is the problem, when one boy in a photo of playing children ist retouched?
Nothing relating to the content of the image has been changed, just the composition is slightly different.