• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Macro Photography do you need to process images

Tim Davey

New member
Hi all,

Has been a while since I have contributed anything, in part due to the anticipation of getting some new kit, particularly a 105mm macro lens. Well it arrived and I managed to spend Sunday late afternoon trying it out. I've just got home to have a look at the shots and thought wow this one just seems right straight from RAW. Let me know what you think about the attached photo. Do you think it captures that arty look I was going for and would it benefit from further processing? If it does what would you do?

AbstractNicotinia.jpg


Thanks for any comments

Tim..
 
Let me know what you think about the attached photo. Do you think it captures that arty look I was going for and would it benefit from further processing? If it does what would you do?

Tim, macro photography means having to deal with an extremely thin Depth of Field. You utilized that to create a sense of depth, but I wonder why you put the focus plane where you did. I also would clone some pink in the lower left corner, just to increase the sensation of being drawn in, rather than having to conquer an obstacle.

Bart
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Hi all,

Has been a while since I have contributed anything, in part due to the anticipation of getting some new kit, particularly a 105mm macro lens. Well it arrived and I managed to spend Sunday late afternoon trying it out. I've just got home to have a look at the shots and thought wow this one just seems right straight from RAW. Let me know what you think about the attached photo. Do you think it captures that arty look I was going for and would it benefit from further processing? If it does what would you do?

AbstractNicotinia.jpg


Hi Tim,

My first reaction to the image is impressive and attractive. That's the start.

"Arty"? I don't really know what that is because it can be so many things as can Art, except "arty" implies like art or in the style of art, or the sort of stuff that seems to sell in galleries and I wonder how they get away with selling it!

So l cannot usefuly talk about "arty" since that is not my sphere of knowledge or interest.

Art however interests me immensely.

This, to me at least requires some sense that transcends the mere pattern, colors and compositon to make one want to return and evoke feelings, emotions, ideas and questions even perhaps about the very nature of our values and existence.

Now to your picture!

The essential impact of the image is related to the limited depth of focus, the flower color and shape of the petals as well as the angle of the shot.

While one cannot say this is not art because the highlights are over exposed and the detail is thus lost, I ask if this is useful to your image.

Matisse had a sculpture fall. This was the reclining nüde. He painted the image then proceeded to rescue the sculpture and it seems that he took advantage of the damage in his final design.

Another of Matisse's sculptures split in the trunk during firng of the clay around a soft center. He decised to exploit this and cast it in bronxe for the final exhibited work.

Here however, I feel that the blown highlights do not help the picture. If you insist it is what you want, then your taste trumps mine.

I'd rather look to see what you like about the image and get back to work, checking the light and including all the tonalities within your image.

Caveat: My comments are based on straightforward photography, where one tries to use the camera to draw an image. I like the subject and the goals but I feel that this is a project that needs more work! Others might see your image differently, perhaps as having significant features of abstraction that make the technical issues I see as unimportant!

Asher
 

Tim Davey

New member
Thanks for the pointers and comments. This truely is a starting point as I begin to investigate what can be created with a macro lens and what I and other see as appealing. I'll submit further attempts as I progress.

Thanks again

Tim..
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Hi Tim,

You are a great sport in accepting my criticisms! My own views are sometimes pretty harsh and may appear unkind but not as bad as saying "great picture" which is really an empty comment and cannot be used for further work.

Good luck on your new work. We have excellent Macro photographs here to look at and people to give informed feedback, so continue posting. The key is to shoot more!

Asher
 
Top