• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Montana, part 4

Installment #4: St.Mary River at night

01: St.Mary River and the moon:

206349855-L.jpg


02: St.Mary River:

206349914-L.jpg


All taken around 10 pm
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Thanks Nik for sharing your travels!

This picture is intriguing and forces me to rethink my general (and probably unfounded) antipathy with automatic "milkyness" of fast water in landscapes. I have learned to appreciate this effect somewhat. The scanning backs give a 3rd look. However, I like to see spray and ripples and droplets in the air arounf a waterfall. That's jusy my preference.

Here, Nik, I would be totally stymied! Unless one has a powerful flash, very slow shutter speeds are needed gives the milky dreamy look that people celebrate. So the first picture forces me to look at things in a new light and I must say I do like it. I would love to see this picture with the brightness boosted as there's a lot of detail in the foreground river bed that could help anchor the image.

What is pushing into the image from the left? Is it a shadow or an OOF bush or branch?

Did you add that Northern star or moon?

I think that this picture could be worth a lot of work to bring out its potential in a print! If you go that far, I'd love to see the final result.

Asher

The second picture I save my comments until after others have posted!
 
Asher,
thank you very much for commenting!

Well, I didn't add the moon in #1 or the stars in #2. They were there. It was, as I already mentioned, after 10 pm. These two are heavily bracketed and manually blended exposures with the ball park being around ISO800 + 30 sec.

I'm not sure about "left pushing". It was just like this. The only light was coming from the moon, ther rest WERE shadows :)

Stay tuned!
 
Shadows I guessed! But of what? Trees?
Asher
Asher,
there were not shadows as in "light from the left is blocked by the trees".
There was simply no other light except fromt he moon, and it only could be reflected from the water directly in front of the camera. Also, there was no sky on the left, hence the left-hand part was, yes, dark:)
 
Top