I have been asked about shooting some bikini-clad models posing at typical tourist locations for a local calendar. Scenery will vary from swampy grassland to mountainous jungle. I do not own a polarizing filter, but am thinking that maybe I should get one. For those who know- do you think I would see a major improvement by using one, and what should I bear in mind when choosing it?
Hi Clayton,
I make selective use of a Circular Polarizing filter. It can help to get more saturated colors on shiny/waxy surfaces. They can also be used to darken the blue of the sky (to increase the contrast with the clouds) but the effect changes with the angle towards the sun (it's maximum at 90 degrees from sun angle). That makes it a lesser candidate for wide angle lenses. Also, the 90 degree angle to the sun isn't necessarily the best angle for other objects at the same time, so you'll have to choose.
It'll slow down your shooting (not only because it absorbs more than a stop of light), unless you use it on a given scene in a single position. I may use it in a single position if most of the subjects are oriented all in the same direction towards the light (e.g. certain kinds of foliage/grass). Otherwise you'll have to continuously adjust for the desired result (which is
not necessarily at maximum reflection attenuation).
Whatever you choose, it should be a "Circular" version of a Polarization filter instead of the "Linear" variety. That is necessary to prevent unpredictable lightmetering effects, and perhaps issues with the AA-filter in front of your sensor.
Cheers,
Bart