• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Prague chronicles

Tom dinning

Registrant*
_DSC0966.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]


[
_DSC0969.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]]


[
_DSC0982.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]]


[
_DSC0985.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]]


[
_DSC1034.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]]​
 
Hi Tom,

Thanks for sharing some of your visual memories. I like the compositional choices you made for most of them. Hope your trip to Europe is/was pleasant.

Cheers,
Bart
 

Chris Calohan II

Well-known member
I realize that many of you on this forum are film users only which I think I'll always love the most and I know there are many who've transcended both the film and digital arenas.

I am finding myself drawn heavily into the landscape mode more than just about anything else but I do not have a good landscape lens.

I am shooting a Nikon D7000 and I really like this camera, so much so I do not want to try to do both a new body and a new lens. I've been looking at Carl Zeiss lenses but all of them seem only to be fixed primes, manual focus. If I was going to pick one of those this moment, it would be the 2.8 16mm.

It's a little pricey and I wonder if in building a furthering love for landscapes wouldn't it be better for me to buy a good zoom, somewhere in the vicinity of 14 or 16, 2.8 or even 4 to let's say, to 35mm and stay with Nikkor optics.

I would love some feedback on this as I really don't want to go blindly into the night and randomly pick a huge loser lens.
 
Top