• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Rose

Michelle Jones

New member
This is from a bunch of roses that I bought a couple of weeks ago. Hope you like it. Comments are always welcome. :)
http://www.missyspixelplace.com/sspryte/3/imgOrig/pinky_rose.jpg


pinky_rose.jpg


pinky_rose.jpg






I set the urls between
to let them appear here. Asher
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is from a bunch of roses that I bought a couple of weeks ago. Hope you like it. Comments are always welcome. :)
http://www.missyspixelplace.com/sspryte/3/imgOrig/pinky_rose.jpg

Not bad (both image, and quality of the rose after a couple of weeks no less), but there's some room for improvement. Personally I'd have cropped (given the result) the image to a portrait layout, just cropping the curling edges of the petals in the left and right background. That would also lose the dark area on the bottom-left which now asks too much attention. It then could also use a bit more sharpening to bring the 'fabric' to life.

Bart
 

nicolas claris

OPF Co-founder/Administrator
I tend to agree with Bart:

pinky_rose.jpg


Though the attempt for sharpening shows that the original image was not that sharp/detailed (lens blurring?), despite my tries in this regard, I couldn't get a better sharpened/textured of the image, I'm sure Bart should give it a try!
 
Last edited:
I tend to agree with Bart:

like this?

Yes, although I envisoned it even tighter on the right.

Though the attempt for sharpening shows that the original image was not that sharp/detailed (lens blurring?), despite my tries in this regard, I couldn't get a better sharpened/textured of the image, I'm sure Bart should give it a try!

Well, there is a lack of sharpness at the original size and a JPEG isn't the best start for manipulation. This is what I could extract without too much experimentation and without prior knowledge of the camera.
pinky_rose_IPRL.jpg


I initially even cropped tighter, totally losing the lower righthand side vertical petal edge, and I could have applied noise reduction, but then we're not going for the Nobel price on this one. When the image is resampled to 800 pixels high and then sharpened, things look much nicer on screen (here I kept the original size for comparison though).

Bart
 
Top