Although I won't be taking part in this discussion, I found it informative...
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84462
Regards.
Well, Fahim, that's a provocative subject!
The idea that one cannot refuse to work against one's beliefs is shocking to a lot of folks but based on a humanitarian interest that supercedes personal or cultural preferences of anyone offering a public service. Let's assume that one is simply uncomfortable for any good or bad reason with photographing gays, not to serve that person would sacrifice protection of that minority and all other minorities you favor. They'll always be someone who won't repair cars for a Jew, Muslim or Krishna in an orange robe.
Still, of one is uncomfortable, what does one do? After all, can one do a good job when turned off? I think one can. However, there are lines not to be crossed.
Perhaps in photography, if one feels very strongly about gay ceremonies, simply arrange for the work to be done by a collaborating photographer. That way, no feelings are hurt. After all, why would anyone want their pictures taken by someone who is not enthusiastic about the event? Part of the contract might be that we may assign a shoot to someone specializing in a particular type of wedding.
I think that if one could devise a positive approach where one has photographers who really understand the components of a Greek or Hindu wedding, or else has an affinity to shoot gay unions, then why not?
Asher
