Hi Asher
The word "Dadaist" was certainly new to me - had to go and research first before even trying to reply. Thanks for expanding my vocabulary, although after having read up a bit on it, it may be safer for me not to use it - such a small word with such a vast meaning.
I have no idea why there are two images. Should only be one. Please delete one.
Thanks
Well then, that was performance art, as it has now become one image again! People will have to just imagine there were two and derive something from it!
If there is not shock value to the disorder in the picture and only one copy, then I'd straighten the photograph so that everything is orthogonal. Then I'd crop away the background and the last cross bar at the bottom of the photograph. That now would deliver a picture that has an anthropomorphic feel and becomes impressive. The background I'd leave as it is.
Photographs, can go beyond documentation or mere personal mementos. They can submit to viewers some of the ideas of the photographer and/or provide a structure or spaces in which to explore, discover or recall ideas and perhaps consequences amusing or instructive to us.
So, those background blobs are useful in giving something for the eye to flit to and perhaps generate some thought based on the viewers own imperatives or fancy.
If it has to be clean then, as mentioned above, the entire frame has to be considered.
Asher