David Robertson
New member
I do not usually do this sort of thing but I noticed a big difference in the conversion of an image between Silkypix 3.0 and LR. What struck me was the muddy and smudged colours of LR but better detail, versus the fantastic colours of Silkypix but poorer detail. For more comparisons I have also provided conversions from C1Pro and RSP. The words in the image read "Controlled ZONE".
I'm not particularly pleased with any of them but would choose the C1Pro version.
What am I seeing here and what would you do in the various convertors to improve things?
http://www.scot-image.co.uk/RawC.html
The file is from a tripod mounted Canon 1ds, 70-210 @ 125mm, F10, 1/80sec, ISO 100. The conversions (16bit tiffs) are the defaults offered by the various convertors with no sharpening added. Saved as Max quality jpegs.
I'm not particularly pleased with any of them but would choose the C1Pro version.
What am I seeing here and what would you do in the various convertors to improve things?
http://www.scot-image.co.uk/RawC.html
The file is from a tripod mounted Canon 1ds, 70-210 @ 125mm, F10, 1/80sec, ISO 100. The conversions (16bit tiffs) are the defaults offered by the various convertors with no sharpening added. Saved as Max quality jpegs.