• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Warning: and are NSFW. Threads may start of as text only but then pictures could be added as part of a discussion or to make some point. This is not for family viewing without a parent's consent and supervision. If you are under age 18, please do not use this section
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

what do you think of this image in its original context

Mark Hampton

New member
Eden-Aberjil--005.jpg


Private Eden Abergil sparked outrage when she posted pictures of herself with
Palestinian captives on her Facebook page. Photograph: Getty Images/AFP


story - here

there are other URLs and versions of this story...

My question is - you think of this image in its original context?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
No Abu Greb but shameful, none the less to pose in front of seated prisoners.

Eden-Aberjil--005.jpg


Private Eden Abergil sparked outrage when she posted pictures of herself with
Palestinian captives on her Facebook page. Photograph: Getty Images/AFP



story - here

there are other URLs and versions of this story...

My question is - you think of this image in its original context?​


Hi Mark,

It's demeaning to the girl soldier and the prisoners and she should and will be punished for sure. When she catches up with her ill-thought out action, she will be humiliated more than she could ever imagine as this behavior is not how Israeli's are taught to think or behavior to exhibit. Photography of detained civilians, suspects, criminals or prisoners should be limited to that need for safety and documentation. Even a hint of public display is morally wrong and against Judaic teaching. "Though shall't nor steal the dust off a poor man's head" is an injunction not to ever humiliate another human being. Her job is security. This picture might have been taken as something just to remind her of her service, but now, after Abu Greb pictures from Iraq in February 15th 2006, the egregious humiliation of Iraqi prisoners designed to break their will, has left us with a scarred psyche. Everything like this, is going to be viewed in the worse way. So when the girl soldier's rather foolish and far, far more innocent innocent memento is seen world wide, we have a natural eruption of distaste and déjà vu!

However, I see more good to this than the childish inconsiderate unacceptable behavior. The exposure of the picture will remind us to reteach our young people of the dignity of man. This lesson is important and hopefully will prevent the real shameful Abu Greb like violations in the future. No matter how many roadside bombs kill civilians or homicide bombers blow up teenagers in dance floors or pizza parlors, the soldiers must be held accountable to humane standards and not those of the perpetrators. The IDF has to update it's training and awareness and doubtless will do.

Let's hope everyone takes the lesson to heart!

Asher​
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
There is always room for some hope, but not much when it's the result of government policy. While the settlement policies are understandable as a tactic, they are a road to self-destruction.

Bart

Bart,

Let me go over some of the background. It's not going to be in perfect order, but you will get the "gestalt" of it!

In the 1900's these areas were mostly totally barren and then Jewish settlements attracted laborers coming for jobs from Syria, Iraq and North Africa. Jews were there in uninterrupted settlement for the past 2.000 years. There were towns with mostly Jews like Safad and Jerusalem, the old Jewish Quarter and town mostly Arab like Jaffa and Jerusalem and Nablus, for example. Much of the land was empty and belonged to the Turkish Empire. Since then, especially in the past 50 years, overnight settlers came. Then both Jews and Arabs built caravan sites and colonized. However, the Jews were more organized to do this and flourished. Then in the 1960's Yasser Arafat built the Palestinian people's movement as a nation. They consist of over 60% of the Hashemite kingdom of Jordan and are also scattered in towns still called refugee camps but really urban areas like in many major cities.

So there's a big mix of claims. Europe, responsible for so much of the colonial empire around the world has shrunk their various imperial ambitions. France and the U.K. still have places all over the world under their control directly or indirectly. Frankly the Arabs don't have much trust to spare and why on earth should the Jews trust the Europeans? Look at the history. Apart from the Dutch and the Danes, everyone rushed to cooperate with the Nazis. Perhaps, if Europe was not so inhospitable to Jews, Zionism would not have been the sole hope of the Jews who escaped from the pogroms and anti-Semitism of continental Europe. Then again, the revolutionary movement of Arafat wouldn't have forged the Palestinian people as a nation in the 60's in response to Zionism. We could even go back to the early 20th Century. If Turkey had not joined Germany and allowed German warships flagged as Turkish, to attack Russia, likely the Turkish Empire might have survived. There would be neither Iraq, Egypt, Syria not Israel, Just provinces in the Turkish Empire. Without that war, perhaps the Armenians wouldn't have been mistrusted and the Turks wouldn't have devised the solution to their "Armenian Problem" and a million Armenians wouldn't have been massacred on death marches.

But Turkey did allow the German ships to be flagged and got drawn into the war, saw it's magnificent Empire become spoils for France and Britain to be drawn and quartered with rulers on maps to make the states of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Palestine under new colonial rule. Just two decades later, European nations couldn't even wait for Nazis arrive. In many cases, Austria, (the birth base of the Nazis} and all over the Baltic States and Hungary, Jews were attacked and rounded up, even before Nazis arrived! After the war, I was brought up in the U.K. and went to school under police escort because of anti-Semitism. We were constantly under attack in the street and even in our home. That was normal life in the part of London we lived. Israelis come from 3 sources: The families who trace their roots for the last several thousand years in Israel. The Jews expelled from Arab lands and the dredges of the concentration camps and destroyed ghettos of Europe. The Arabs likewise are made of folk who have lived in towns and villages for endless generations, nomads and laborers from Arab countries and now people who have never been allowed citizenship in neighboring Arab countries. Each of the two groups has suffered terribly.

So is it any surprise, that the Israelis do not trust the Europeans. Not that the Muslims get a fairer shake. Turkish Muslims are abused in Germany and France. France and Germany are blocking Turkey from joining the European Common Market. The Europeans didn't intervene to help the Kosovo Muslims. It was left to the USA under Bill Clinton under the constant barrage of pressure from a remarkable man, Robert Dole. Did the Muslims give the USA any thanks, not really. Still, Clinton is a welcome figure in Kosovo.

The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, a pet project of Britain was created out of the eastern portion of Palestine and the western part, with Jews and Arabs became the contested area for Arabs and Jews. The fact that the colonial Brits called both Arabs and Jews "wogs" or worse, with zero respect, didn't provide any path to future peace.

Just as Arab governments are made up of hawks and more peaceful elements, the same with Israel. So it's a challenge for everyone to even dare speak of peace. So for both the Jews and the Arabs alike, settling differences is not desirable but necessary.

The Muslims were for much of their history on pretty good terms with the Jews. In fact, the Turkish Empire was a haven. It's the Christians who ran the rape and pillage holy "crusades". Imagine, we were taught in school of the nobility of Christian knights going on pilgrimages to Jerusalem. In fact they raped and pillaged a giant destructive path ravaging first Jewish ghetto communities in Europe then Muslims and Jews in the Middle East and all the way to Jerusalem!

So, is there any reason to wonder why Arabs might not trust foreigners and also equate Jews with the imperialists!

The Arabs have states of Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States all of which are uniquely Arab states and based on the Muslim tradition. Israel then is a tiny Jewish State. There's blame to go around. The Turks and the carvers of Turkey. The oil hungry Europeans for making bonds with Arab States but not having clear solutions for the rights of Jews. All this led to Jews and the modern Palestinians, now Arab, scrambling for the same land.

So it's complex. Both sides are long term inhabitants and both also colonialists and both have been screwed by so many powers, that they have few left they can trust. Still, under this bad circumstance, there's even more reason to find common cause. They must make peace with one another. The first thing to be done is to show each other common respect and decent behavior. This story of the girl soldier getting he picture taken near some seated prisoners set of alarm bells in Israel and abroad. This is one of the signal moments where we need to harvest good ideas and get ourselves on track to human understanding. It's a good anomaly. It reveals where sickness can grow. It will and must be responded to properly.

Asher
 
Last edited:
So it's complex. Both sides are colonialists.

Hi Asher,

Sure, it's not simple, otherwise it would have been solved by now.

Yet, I fail to see how harassment, taking of legally owned land, rock trowing at children, curfews only for Palestinians for no reason, etc., etc., IOW the systematic (!) dehumanization, will create a better future. IMHO it only creates more people without a future, with nothing to lose ...

I don't know if the following link can be seen outside of the Netherlands, but the Dutch Jewish broadcasting organisation aired an interesting 5 episode documentary series called "Israel, between dream and reality". Large parts are English spoken (and Hebrew, Arab and Dutch), so it might be interesting to have a look at one of the episodes with Col. Danny Tirza (he was the architect of the wall):
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=11117968

It shows how many in Israel have no idea what's going on, because they are (literally) shielded from reality, and how things escalate over time. Like the illustrative image that kicked of this thread, photography and cinematography/video prove to be important tools in informing both sides of this conflict. Maybe by exposing the stupidity on both sides will help, but I'm not optimistic.

Cheers,
Bart
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Hi Asher,

Sure, it's not simple, otherwise it would have been solved by now.
Agreed!

Yet, I fail to see how harassment, taking of legally owned land, rock trowing at children, curfews only for Palestinians for no reason, etc., etc., IOW the systematic (!) dehumanization, will create a better future. IMHO it only creates more people without a future, with nothing to lose ...

Bart, this is amazingly argumentative and judgmental! Each of the items, with no context, is listed as if it is true! "Taking of legally owned land", (just the first statement}, is not documented or explained in context. In the USA, cities are always taking land for eminent domain.Arabs might have have built homes on public land with no permits. No doubt some misjudgments occur. Even plain theft must occur as in any society. It could even be that the Arab has an uphill fight in courts. However, ultimately, the law has to be followed and Btselem and other Jewish organizations advocating for Palestinians, will take up their cause. What systematic dehumanization? The Palestinians teach their children to hate. Math taught with the sums based on how many Jews are left after killing a number. Songs of hatred in summer camps. Kids taught to have homicide vests. Jews are not taught like that anywhere in the world.

Throwing stones at children? Come on. for sure there must be some nut some time doing that. However, no civilized values-based society like the Jews have built in Israel, would tolerate such behavior. I'm sure there must be at least one child molester in Holland. But what does that mean for the Dutch as a people? Do they now come to be called on this? Are they now going to be labelled, yes the Dutch people themselves, as "perverts"?

When Jews, Israelis and friends of Israel, see the problems packaged so neatly as

"Yet, I fail to see how harassment, taking of legally owned land, rock trowing at children, curfews only for Palestinians for no reason, etc., etc., IOW the systematic (!) dehumanization, will create a better future. IMHO it only creates more people without a future, with nothing to lose .."

The impression is received as there is zero empathy for the Jews, just one neat meme package of sentiments concerning the Palestinians. What's fascinating is the lack of concern for the Darfur victims: A million displaced blacks, (pagan and Christian) hundreds of thousand of real rapes and murders and there's not a 1/100 of the passion for their cause! It's just fashionable to focus on the Palestinians as victims and not the far greater tragedies, real slaughter, not humiliation. The 20th and 21st Centuries have created empathy by fashion and outrage by exception: selective outrage. In all the gassing of hte Kurds and Iranians, by the Iraqi Baathists and the filling of Yemeni valleys with poison gas by the Egyptians, the massacre of ~ 60,000 Palestinians )Black September) by the Jordanian Army under king Hussein with the rest being driven into exile by way of Syria, the shelling and total destruction by Assad senior of Syrian towns that rebelled against his iron dictatorship ...we could list more... bur none of these lead to student movements, mass demonstrations of any consequence.

Why? We had no strategic interest and the victims were not on the fashionista list of preferred victims.

Where was even 1/1000 of this empathy for thousands of Muslim teachers and children, hands wired behind their backs and shot by Serb Christians after the Dutch UN soldiers there to protect them were ordered off by the Serbs and left without even bothering to ask their consciences if these were human beings being left to be slaughtered. That was not "humiliation". The fact of the matter was that Europeans had no sympathy for European Muslims! What's become clear is that a. Europeans consider themselves fair and just, and b. they have objections only to what happens to their pet fashionalble victims, right now the Palestinians. Other victims, the Tibetans, Chechnyans, Darfur Blacks, Kurds massacred regularly from the air by Turkish bombers, are too different and distant to really make a fuss about! What mass movements are there for these unimportant victims? What amazes me is the rationed selective moral outrage that is only expressed for folk whose friends have oil!


I don't know if the following link can be seen outside of the Netherlands, but the Dutch Jewish broadcasting organisation aired an interesting 5 episode documentary series called "Israel, between dream and reality". Large parts are English spoken (and Hebrew, Arab and Dutch), so it might be interesting to have a look at one of the episodes with Col. Danny Tirza (he was the architect of the wall):
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=11117968

It shows how many in Israel have no idea what's going on, because they are (literally) shielded from reality, and how things escalate over time. Like the image that kicked of this thread, photography and cinematography/video prove to be important tools in informing both sides of this conflict.

Cheers,
Bart

If the Europeans can also show moral outrage for folk who are powerless and without important allies, will their opinions count for much. The abandonment of

Darfur
Chechnya
Tibet
Congo
Somalia,
Kosovo
Rwanda
Zimbabwe

with real massacres, make the words of the Europeans rather empty. If Europe would intervene in Sudan, it would take just 20,000 soldiers and they could have save hundreds of thousands of lives. Yet, even China and Russia in Tibet and Chechnya could have been tackled. So what do the Europeans do? They gang up on the people who they drove out of their lands. If a girl takes a picture of Arab prisoners seated, they see that as humiliation! Certainly is foolish and disrespectful. However the Europeans should feel humiliated themselves for having outrage only where there's no risk.

When the Europeans practice selective outrage, how can they be trusted by the Jews?

This doesn't give the Israelis a pass to wrong the Palestinians! It just removes European influence and wisdom when it is so sorely needed. Unfortunately, the Jews and Palestinians are going to have to make peace despite themselves, but on their own. Maybe the Americans will help bang their heads together so they see some sense!

You may wonder why the special fuss over Palestinians. Well it could be they have the most valid and noble claims. for sure they do need more rights and help, the must have a state, but why the concern from Christian Europe? I wonder whether it's our inheritance from the Crusades. Wide-eyed missionaries have labored for so long under the delusion that they can bring blessings and salvation to the Muslim world by converting Muslim children at the other end of a piece of bread or a schoolbook. The Americans, (a lot of the US State Departments Arabists) where dedicated to advancing the lot of the Muslims. They found that Muslims are not so quick to relinquish thousands of years of culture and belief for Christianity. The missionaries and schools then aimed their sights on the Armenians, as if their belief in the Trinity and resurrection was not genuine enough and proceeded to convert them, making forts to Jesus across the Turkish Empire. In Palestine, they turned attention to the Jews. At first they really believed that Jews, given the chance, would accept Jesus with open arms. Hey, that would fulfill prophecies and hasten a second coming! This seemed far more attractive than dealing with devout Muslims! So they actually helped with Jews farming on desert land, trying to make it bloom again. After that silly experiment failed, (the deserts bloomed, the malarial swamps were drained, but they had no converts! So they devoted themselves to work in the Arab countries setting up colleges in Beirut and Egypt, and putting conversion on the back-burner, so to speak, with proselytizing by seduction instead.

Asher
 
Bart, this is amazingly argumentative and judgmental!

You bet it is, just as I judge the Palestinian rockets and bombing and their abuse against their own factions! I'm also judgemental about, as one example out of many, the corrupt Pakistan Government that did little to prevent the disaster that hit the underprivileged population. And there are more examples, but none have to do with the OP's picture.

Each of the items, with no context, is listed as if it is true! "Taking of legally owned land", (just the first statement}, is not documented or explained in context. In the USA, cities are always taking land for eminent domain.Arabs might have have built homes on public land with no permits. No doubt some misjudgments occur. Even plain theft must occur as in any society. It could even be that the Arab has an uphill fight in courts. However, ultimately, the law has to be followed and Btselem and other Jewish organizations advocating for Palestinians, will take up their cause. What systematic dehumanization?

C'mon Asher, surely the American media must make mention of those (daily) facts once in a while, unless they don't or only show one (biased) side of the conflict (which would explain your reaction). How soon do we forget the atrocities that do make it to the media, white phosphorous bombs on civilian targets, the (over-)reaction to a provocative sea convoy to also bring some humanitarian goods to the people that get denied not only cement for the reconstruction of houses (because Hamas might use it to build a bunker) but also medication and food supplies. They are only the tip of an iceberg.

The Palestinians teach their children to hate.

Yes, totally wrong and unproductive, but then there is little to love about their neigbors when you look at it from their perspective, is there? Why feed those sentiments one might ask, why not let the educated ones come to their own conclusions, so why not improve education?

When Jews, Israelis and friends of Israel, see the problems packaged so neatly as

"Yet, I fail to see how harassment, taking of legally owned land, rock trowing at children, curfews only for Palestinians for no reason, etc., etc., IOW the systematic (!) dehumanization, will create a better future. IMHO it only creates more people without a future, with nothing to lose .."

The impression is received as there is zero empathy for the Jews, just one neat meme package of sentiments concerning the Palestinians.

Ah, as soon as someone points out the misdoings of individuals, one cries Anti-Semitism. Stupid! People are criticized for their actions, regardless of their background. Trying to display it as something else is a diversion tactic. Too transparent. Also comparing to someone elses faults doesn justify one's own wrongdoing.

Europeans consider themselves fair and just, and b. they have objections only to what happens to their pet fashionalble victims, right now the Palestinians.

Not that I can speak for all Europeans, but there must be something wrong with the media available in other parts of the world then.

As in the example I linked to from the Jewish broadcasting organisation (unless you say they have an agenda as Europeans), it is a 5 part documentary with I think 5x 40 minutes of information and examples of what is going on. Sure, a documentary can show a certain aspect of something without discussing all other aspects, but it isn't propaganda, it's a documentary with interviews with high ranking officials and people from the street. There are many more such documentaries, and not only about this conflict, but it doesn't make much sense to share them if the language gets in the way.

What amazes me is the rationed selective moral outrage that is only expressed for folk whose friends have oil!

I don't see the immediate connection with the above, but oil isn't the only resource that causes conflict. I wonder if the media in other countries ever report about the global shortage of clean drinking water, one of the next major sources of conflict.

We currently see lots of media coverage of the terrible flooding in Pakistan, but little about drinking water. Maybe the media are a bit selective in what they have to offer?

Photography is a powerful medium, let's also use it for creating awareness so it can lead to informed opinions, decisions, and improved living conditions.

Cheers,
Bart
 
Last edited:

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
eden1.jpg

Photograph: Getty Images/AFP


story - here

there are other URLs and versions of this story...

My question is - you think of this image in its original context?

Let me summarize, and get away from grandstanding and explanations that might seem biased. This picture is frightening as it reminds us of the infamous Abu Grab pictures, even though here, the waitng detainees are just sitting in the b.g. There is no way folk arrested/detained for any reason should be used as a "fun" background. They are humans, not some waterfall or tourist place one visited.

Asher
 

Mark Hampton

New member
Let me summarize, and get away from grandstanding and explanations that might seem biased. This picture is frightening as it reminds us of the infamous Abu Grab pictures, even though here, the waitng detainees are just sitting in the b.g. There is no way folk arrested/detained for any reason should be used as a "fun" background. They are humans, not some waterfall or tourist place one visited.

Asher

Asher,

Above was the context - the idea that a person has become an object for the background - with as much dignity given to them as the concrete wall / blocks.. A prop for someone to show off in front of..

To then post without thought to claim what?

I was there? here is me in front of this wall?

The other aspect was the female / male narrative - this image became over reported to an extending because of the woman, and her banal stupidity (I was going to post the image as a found image in the thread but the thread made me smile) to these real people.

There are a hundred thousand other images made by people in wars around the world like this, it seems to me they are made with the purpose of the objectification of the human and are symptomatic of they way our minds are changed by the surfing of others.

I have very little to say in relation to crisis that is unfolding in the middle east, but from what I do read online and in papers / books etc. It certainly has its uses for the power structures on all sides that need fear to exist in there present forms.
 
Top