• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Warning: and are NSFW. Threads may start of as text only but then pictures could be added as part of a discussion or to make some point. This is not for family viewing without a parent's consent and supervision. If you are under age 18, please do not use this section
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Abstraction, Abstract: something real or not? :) An education on approach to art.

Status
Not open for further replies.
More importantly it would mean that The National Gallery in Washington might need to revise their art classification scheme and nomenclature or else hire a new curator!

3d-rofl.gif
 

Alain Briot

pro member
From “Abstract Art” in Modern Art 19th and 20th Centuries: Selected Papers by Meyer Schapiro, Paragraphs 1-3

Schapiro is universally acknowledged as one of the 20th century’s great art historians. This paper on abstract art is important to anyone wishing to know the history and meanings of abstraction. I’ll send 3 paragraphs a day until I come to the end.=

Looks like it's time for installments 2 and 3 :)

I want to read the whole essay. Then we'll see if the Ntl gallery curator still has a job or not.

And in the meantime, this essay by Ben is relevant to this thread, in particular section 2 - "What is Abstract Art":

http://www.rawworkflow.com/making_pictures/index.html
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Looks like it's time for installments 2 and 3 :)

I want to read the whole essay. Then we'll see if the Ntl gallery curator still has a job or not.

And in the meantime, this essay by Ben is relevant to this thread, in particular section 2 - "What is Abstract Art":

http://www.rawworkflow.com/making_pictures/index.html
From “Abstract Art” in Modern Art 19th and 20th Centuries: Selected Papers by Meyer Schapiro, Paragraphs 1-3

Schapiro is universally acknowledged as one of the 20th century’s great art historians. This paper on abstract art is important to anyone wishing to know the history and meanings of abstraction. I’ll send 3 paragraphs a day until I come to the end.=

Until electricity, light came from the sky, lanterns or candles. History describes what was!

The the National Gallery is what is!

Asher
 

Ray West

New member
Hi Alain,

You looking for the curator's job? I doubt if you would get it. They need someone who can read, I expect, or at least someone who can do simple sums, who recognises the difference between one word 'abstraction' and two words 'abstract art'.

I have a pretty tough and thick "photographic skin" -I paid my dues you know, for quite a few years- and I say what's on my mind when it comes to commenting on photographs. My goal is to help.

Help? You say you help? Your "help" has been weighed, measured, and found wanting.

Best wishes,

Ray

 
Last edited:

nicolas claris

OPF Co-founder/Administrator
It is amazing (astonishing?) that this threads begins and ends (yet) by deleted posts.

Without rewriting the history, I strongly feel, that, in an open area such as OPF, one must respect each other and argue with strong but polite (not offending) opinions and adjectives...

This is the price for nice behavior (behaviour?) and for being able to freely express our strong beliefs.

I had l like to see this discussion all sitting around a table with some great wine, water, beer, tea or what ever one prefers, and after a strongly but friendly argumented discussion one toast all each others.

No doubt we're all here because we all wish to share feelings, tricks, informations, the how, the when, the why and all the questionnings about photography.
Because we think we are free people or because we think, that if we aren't, we should.

Common guys come back from your bitter spirit and get here with a glass in hand! we need you all…

[he said with a warm smile]
 
Last edited:

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
The discussion of fundamental ideas in any subject can test even what different things mean.

It is very difficult for us to remove anything as we must protect the path of free expression.

Speaking for Nicolas and all the others in the team, let me emphasize the value of difference of opinion. Debates are the cauldrons in which we test the mettle of our values and knowledge. We anneal more worthy ideas into our being and become better at whatever we try to achieve. That is why we are an open forum.

Ray is my great friend who labors many hours to keep the forum going in the right direction. He is a genrous person. So he will, I know, excuse me for removing his thoughts, for the time being. I'm troubled doing so, and that is a good thing that I have a conscience.

Asher
 
The discussion of fundamental ideas in any subject can test even what different things mean....Debates are the cauldrons in which we test the mettle of our values and knowledge. We anneal more worthy ideas into our being and become better at whatever we try to achieve. That is why we are an open forum.

Awww!

I wish I would have your ability to express my thoughts in the english language! But sometimes, a smiley rolling on the floor laughing, says more than a 1000 words. <grins>

I would sign that any time, and btw. you all succeed in making this forum exactly this, an open forum, open for free exchange of ideas and debates, which makes it so very different to all the others I know about so far.

A challenge in deed, and in my book you succeed to do that with excellence!

I am sure Ray understands!

Btw. did anyone think about sending Harvey a private message to re join here and re post his picture? I feel bad that we never heard from him again after that, I would do that!

I could understand that he might have felt like being chased out, by a somewhat initially difficult reaction that could have easily be interpreted as rude.
 
I had l like to see this discussion all sitting around a table with some great wine, water, beer, tea or what ever one prefers, and after a strongly but friendly argumented discussion one toast all each others. [he said with a warm smile]

I'll have another "Emotion de terroirs 2002" (Domaine Vincent Girardin) please, this outstanding Burgundy just sits so very well with that excellent duck on cherries. <smiles> and I raise my glas to toast you fine people around here and on many more years of friendly and interesting exchange to come!

To Health, Salut, Prost, Cheers, live Long & Prosper! <grins>
 
Last edited:

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Georg, thanks for your kind comments,

Harvey is cool. His removal of the picture, in fact, made me face up to our need to give guidance at intervals on how we approach each other’s generously shared work. Being right is not good enough. First, we may or may not be mistaken! So at the least we must acknowledge the emotional and artistic reality of the image, whatever is truly worthy, so that we have credit and license to be critical.

We are not grading parts in a motorbike factory where anything is either perfect for the task or not.

We must nurture and hold precious everyone one else's sensitivity. Art, after all, involves transmission of the artist’s ideas through something physical. That already is a generous human act and we must never crush it. We are not naive. So we won't be impressed with what is not impressive. That is why we have to be thoughtful and honest.

I have no truck with praising what doesn't move me. False praise is like cheering on someone who is running in the wrong path. The photographer is sharing to tell us how he/she does something, bring us a personal experience that moved them or to get feed back on the current success of the picture in evoking certain feelings and ideas of human value.

Ultimately, we are concerned with making pictures that we will love, brides will treasure, agencies and news services will license, collectors will search for and so forth.

Learning how to share and give comment is best done with care as one would to a close friend or family member. In this process we all learn.

Be generous as one would in one's own home, after all that is what OPF is.

Asher
 
Last edited:

nicolas claris

OPF Co-founder/Administrator
I'll have another "Emotion de terroirs 2002" (Domaine Vincent Girardin) please, this outstanding Burgundy just sits so very well with that excellent duck on cherries. <smiles> and I raise my glas to toast you fine people around here and on many more years of friendly and interesting exchange to come!

To Health, Salut, Prost, Cheers, live Long & Prosper! <grins>

A ta santé !
 

Kevin Bjorke

New member
I think that you make your pictures, and you stick with them or you abandon them & move on.

Harvey, as the initial poster, might already have gained the knowledge he needed and has moved forward with his photography. Isn't *that* the idea of posting, after all?
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
I think that you make your pictures, and you stick with them or you abandon them & move on.

Harvey, as the initial poster, might already have gained the knowledge he needed and has moved forward with his photography. Isn't *that* the idea of posting, after all?
Kevin,

That sounds perfect. However, one can develop a picture in a number of ways. Ansel Adams revisited his work. Also, people may be struggling to transmit some idea and would like feedback to if their own ideas are getting to the viewer.

Asher
 

Jack_Flesher

New member
Coming in a bit late to this thread, but I was lucky enough to have glimpsed Harvey's image early on before it got deleted and had planned to get back to comment later. It really is too bad the thread degenerated into a semantics argument before any constructive comments about the image could be shared.

Anyway Harvey... One, I felt it certainly qualified as an absract from a photographic point of view and two, I personally liked it!

From what I remember of it, I felt the only possible issue might have been the central highlights being perhaps a few points too hot, but that could have been a web thing. Anyway, best of luck on your project and hope it progresses well for you!

Cheers,
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
I'm looking forward to getting the first post back. Harvey's picture should be reposted and then we can discuss with the same title. I see no reason to change the title!

In the meanwhile, this argument has helped open up my own mind to further possibilities that would otherwise be excluded with tight definitions.

BTW, I would challenge someone to come up with pure abstract art. If the artist had an idea then its transformation to a physical form is an expression of something. So how is it abstract? Of ccourse if one defines abstract art as being devoid of relationship in the observors mind, then that is an easier goal to accomplish.

Asher
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top