Pao Dolina
Active member
As the 600/11 is being sold at $699 it is somewhat understandable that Canon would produce a 100-500/7.1 that does not directly compete with it.
But is anyone here thinking that it was a lost opportunity on Canon's part not make their version of the Sony's 200-600/6.3?
It would directly compete with Sigma/Tamron 150-600/6.3 but at focal length that does not overlap with the 70-200.
It would be a cheaper version of the 200-400/4 + 1.4x
The 100-500/7.1 is just so odd.
But is anyone here thinking that it was a lost opportunity on Canon's part not make their version of the Sony's 200-600/6.3?
It would directly compete with Sigma/Tamron 150-600/6.3 but at focal length that does not overlap with the 70-200.
It would be a cheaper version of the 200-400/4 + 1.4x
The 100-500/7.1 is just so odd.