leonardobarreto.com
pro member
"Owners of DSLRs with CMOS sensors may not consider it a big deal, but CCD chips, such as those used in medium format backs, have (until now) had difficulty with long exposures. And by long exposures I'm not talking about minutes. I'm talking about seconds, and in many cases even large fractions of a second.
No, this is not hyperbole, as owners of some MF backs will confirm. A second or two has been the limit for many, and a few even start to get blotchy and noisy at anything more than 1/4 second. ... © 1995-2006 Michael Reichmann"
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/p45-long.shtml
I saw this published at LL and, since don't have a MF digital back, but would like to use one with hot lights "tungsten".
How bad is it. Does it bother photographers doing architectural photography.
By the way, what is more common now in the architectural-industrial field scanning or one shot backs? (or film, Canon etc)
thanks,
LeonardoBarreto.com
No, this is not hyperbole, as owners of some MF backs will confirm. A second or two has been the limit for many, and a few even start to get blotchy and noisy at anything more than 1/4 second. ... © 1995-2006 Michael Reichmann"
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/p45-long.shtml
I saw this published at LL and, since don't have a MF digital back, but would like to use one with hot lights "tungsten".
How bad is it. Does it bother photographers doing architectural photography.
By the way, what is more common now in the architectural-industrial field scanning or one shot backs? (or film, Canon etc)
thanks,
LeonardoBarreto.com