• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Straight from the camera

No post at all.Well?

DSCN1283.jpg
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
No post at all.Well?

DSCN1283.jpg

Michael,

An photograph with a lot of mood that gets ones interest immediately. I commend you for sensing this scene would be so impressive with the long shadows marking out the features in such an effective way. This is a satisfying experience and, as you say, it's right out the camera. Kudos!

Now what's next, the work of making this into a strong image for printing?

The question I have, (besides the obvious ideas one might have on the extraneous cable above the setting sun), is this. Do you really need the sky above the sun? IOW, just the part that's red and a tad more give the idea of the sun going down on this scene and the 3/4" above that seem to me to take away from the scene itself as the blue does catch ones eye. However, does it do anything for the dynamics of everything below. I don't think so.

Thanks so much for sharing.

Asher
 
No post at all.Well?


DSCN1283.jpg

Hi Michael,

To me it demonstrates that we need to help most images with some postprocessing. All technicalities about composition and color aside, here is a very crude attempt to bring out more of the shadow and landscape structures and letting the light sculpt the terrain:

DSCN1283+TM.jpg

Image Copyright Michael K. Carberry, postprocessed by BvdW

The processing is a bit over the top, and of course based on your posted JPEG, just to make the point clear that postprocessing can dramatically change the way an image looks. I only adjusted the tonality an some sharpening.

Cheers,
Bart
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Well here's where I went with it.It was shot with a Nikon Coolpix 4300 in sunset mode and the post was done on my iMac with iPhoto5.

DSCN1283_1.jpg

Michael,

A bold step indeed! You have clearly put the focus on the undulating ground lit by the shallow angle of the fading light. I might have keep just another tiny tad of sky to allow a band to go across as opposed to an almost thin line. It's generous for you to share the original picture as shot.

Asher
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
All technicalities about composition and color aside, here is a very crude attempt to bring out more of the shadow and landscape structures and letting the light sculpt the terrain:

DSCN1283+TM.jpg

Image Copyright Michael K. Carberry, postprocessed by BvdW


Bart,

This s a perfect example of the truth of the matter that we need to not rely on what the camera delivers when we take pictures unless we are shooting for product catalogs or a wedding where there's a standard workflow that one's lab can efficiently do according to one's tried and true formula. For artistic work, we should be able to process the potential image following the ideas we can imagine.

Here is a clear case where the feelings we experience can be altered just be changing the distribution of shading. I believe that if one does not invest n thinking about this for each image, one loses a lot.

Asher
 
Top