Jarmo Juntunen
Well-known member
First one shows a juveline female homo sapiens, shot through a dirty cabin window. It has no arrangement and looks terribly underexposed.
In the second one the same subject is completely lost in the reeds. You can barely see her eyes. And there are definitely no catch lights in the subject's eyes. Her wardrobe is a haphazard collection of sporty but certainly not stylish clothing, suitable for a Norther family outing. But not for fine photography.
The third one shows our subject on a wooden bench of a church. Depth of field here is way too shallow for a portrait.
Now, seriously, do you think I really care about any such nonsense? Hell no. I'm just a proud father with a camera and a youngest kid still willing to pose for me.
In the second one the same subject is completely lost in the reeds. You can barely see her eyes. And there are definitely no catch lights in the subject's eyes. Her wardrobe is a haphazard collection of sporty but certainly not stylish clothing, suitable for a Norther family outing. But not for fine photography.
The third one shows our subject on a wooden bench of a church. Depth of field here is way too shallow for a portrait.
Now, seriously, do you think I really care about any such nonsense? Hell no. I'm just a proud father with a camera and a youngest kid still willing to pose for me.