Jack,
Your protest on "over posting" of Antonio's images has merit but needs further examination. Yes, it is great to have a larger variety of photographers work here and not just what one might consider "trivial snaphots".
(What an argument we could have about just the word "trivial" used here!!
)
We do have very so many many worthy alternatives to Antonios prolific posts, so, for example, here's Steve Teitlebaum's pictures, for example here
and here.
In case you missed them, enjoy all the very creative
lensybaby pictures posted by
different OPF photographers from various parts of the world!
I have gut feelings in the creative process.
This is informed by many years of struggle, thousands of paintings and photographs and a constant hunt to people's intentions and the ability to lock visions into artistic form.
Some people post pictures that I find trite and poorly executed and so out of place next to the other pictures I admire.
However, I stand back and look at the artist and not just what (s)he throws on the table. Antonio has shared here several pictures that I already like very much.
I do think one should be careful as to what one shows.
Post single pictures or several images related by some thing that helps the experience.
Please let's not have "cat pictures" meaning I have a cat, it walked across the room, my camera was nearby so I snapped a shot. Let's not have "vacation snap shots" unless they are in Layback cafe, illustrate that a lens works in the "Buy and Sell Forun" or some other purpose.
Always give a context for the picture: the "what", "how", "where" and "so what" of the picture!
Sure that cat just sat on the wall or walked by. That "happening" could be worthy of recording or not. It might be if you are fascinated, thrilled, intrigued, angered or whatever and manage to embed these feelings in the picture.
Devoid of intent,
this is not the sort of art that I personally am looking to experience. Of course one could debate this and I may be wrong.
My preference is where the artist embeds his/her aesthetics, sensibilities, culture, wishes, directions and more into a work.
Now, where does "happenstance" and "found objects", seizures, and even urinals come in to this?
We could discuss that too!
Jack, I hope I have answered you. Your point was correct, needed, blunt, rather upsetting and unkind too.
However, it was an honest approach and this is OPF after all and you are entitled and needed to express your view. Otherwise this forum would not be "Open".
I'm looking forward to more and well directed, sensitive criticism of other people's work. We also hope you'll share your own pictures!
One person posting a lot of images can be annoying to some. You have a right to protest, but you also should join in and post too!
Art without criticism is incomplete in the wonderful journey of the
Arc of Intent beyond the artist. Art needs to be experienced. Part of that should be reactions. If that is utter rejction, then that should be heard too!
A cat picture,
per se, does not make me feel good, since I have experienced an unfortunate habit of collectors of lenses overdosing us with "cat pictures" to show off the resolution of their bespoke lenses.
However some of the greatest photographers celebrated these animals in fine photographic works. So please no "cat shots"! Photographs taken with care and presented with context only!
Asher
