Rachel Foster
New member
I'm examining photos on an external monitor now, shooting with remote switch, but still don't have my fast lens. Anything better? Or pretty much the same?
I'm examining photos on an external monitor now, shooting with remote switch, but still don't have my fast lens. Anything better? Or pretty much the same?
If you are using jpg the reading .........
Hi Rachel,
Just my opinion - it doesn't matter too much of what you see, much of it's still there. Just a few seconds work (a bit more time, and working on the original would nail it better) Need to blur the flower, maybe - play with levels to bring something more into girl's right eye, obviously get rid of the 8 bit shading artefacts on the neck.
The problem is, .... well you know what the problem is
T
Actually, I do not like or have the patience to do this much editing on an image but try to get the exposure correct initially.
Bev
hot fudge sundaes that cause weight loss.
OK!
(Have an urge to giggle......)
Seriously, one must know both. But the chicken/egg dilemma surfaces. Perhaps the solution is to toss that way of thinking and go with an ebb and flow model. Right now shooting is taking precedence and editing will become more ascendant; each gaining a bit of ground with each cycle.
Oh, I agree Bev, and redoing it is the tack I'm taking. Get it right if you can to begin with. I am impressed by what editing can do, though.