• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

beach scene

Apart from technicalities, I am kinda fond of it. 8 sec exposures x11 on Manfrotto - Olympus E1 - 2007

ovs_opf_XI-18.jpg
 

Andy brown

Well-known member
Lovely image Georg and just a nice amount of movement.

I'm not sure what you mean by 8 sec exposures x 11.

Obviously it's daylight (sunshine) so an 8 sec exposure would require a seriously low ISO rating plus ND's (plenty) plus a tiny aperture.

Are you saying it's 11 seperate exposures each of 8 seconds? I'm not quite comprehending.
The movement in the clouds looks consistent with an 8 second exposure on a windy day but the movements in the grass are quite ambiguous.

Also, am I right to think that the wind was coming from behind you at about a 45 degree angle to your left shoulder?

Sorry for so many questions but I am intrigued.
 
Andy,

Yeah that's right, 11x 8 sec @ ISO 100 F/16 plus strong ND. Wind was in higher spheres, on the ground just the occasional breeze.

Here an hour later:

ovs_opf_XI-19.jpg

 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Apart from technicalities, I am kinda fond of it. 8 sec exposures x11 on Manfrotto - Olympus E1 - 2007

ovs_opf_XI-18.jpg


Georg,

This is fun. I get that the 8 seconds is to add blur and movement of the clouds. Why again 11? Is this tone mapped? What focal length? any stitching? Interesting in B&W after pulling back on the exposure.

Asher
 
Top