James Lemon
Well-known member
Three things mark the XQD card as significantly different from previous card formats:
- Storage size limits
- Read/write speed limits
- Very reliable prevention from corruptibility and failure
Seems fabulous, but we need the other Camera MFRs to join the party!
Nikon is now a relatively minor player
Asher
Except that there aren't enough people experiencing the problems XQD is trying to solve to finance a new format. XQD is likely to stay a niche product.
SD is the de-facto standard. The Secure Digital Ultra Capacity (SDUC) format, described in the SD 7.0 specification, and announced in June 2018, supports cards up to 128 TiB and offers speeds up to 985 MB/s, which is comparable to what the XQD format offers (and higher than what the cited article writes).
Except that there aren't enough people experiencing the problems XQD is trying to solve to finance a new format. XQD is likely to stay a niche product.
SD is the de-facto standard. The Secure Digital Ultra Capacity (SDUC) format, described in the SD 7.0 specification, and announced in June 2018, supports cards up to 128 TiB and offers speeds up to 985 MB/s, which is comparable to what the XQD format offers (and higher than what the cited article writes). Yet most customers are pleased with previous formats and far smaller cards. XQD is an expensive solution to problems customers do not have.
Any idea whether compatibility is likely to be achieved with SD cards to SDUC by a Firmware upgrade?