• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Child portrait - natural light

John Harper

New member
Hi There

Shot i took at a friends house of one of her friends son. Just a grab shot really he was sat next to an open patio door in the lounge no flash or reflectors just as shot.

Comments critiques welcome.

Tech data:

EOS 20D 70-200 F2.8LIS @130mm ISO 400 1/320 @ f4


John

young.jpg
 

Paul Potera

New member
John, I have never seen you post a bad shot. Your sandbagging aren't you? Great light, great balance and the color of the background matches perfectly. Did you change anything, or is that straight from the camera?
 
Just a grab shot really he was sat next to an open patio door in the lounge no flash or reflectors just as shot.

Comments critiques welcome.

Wonderful grab shot, great timing, overall beautiful color, and his expression is priceless.

I like it a lot because of his inquisitive look, although (and here comes the cheap critique) there are a few points that could be better if the opportunity would present itself again (which would unlikely offer the same 'look').

Things that could be improved (if it were a professional portrait, which it isn't, it's a great grab shot) are:
- skin color of the neck/collar-bone area looks too 'pale'/desaturated.
- it's generally a bad idea to have the main light on the cheek facing the camera, it can look like the subject has the mumps.
- A pitty that only one ear is visible with a shot that's almost 'en face'. It draws too much attention on the visible ear, also because of the light.

There are some things you could try, like a bit of selective/gradual darkening (starting from the cheek) of the ear and background, and perhaps slightly desaturating that area, and maybe adding a bit of blur. I didn't try it myself, but that's what I would try to see if it helps to de-emphasize the shortcomings. I might even try and add a hint of the other ear (mirrored, darker, and blurred), just a rim.

Just think of these comments as something my old teachers would have told me in portrait training class, suggestions to get better when you do have time and control. It's still a very intriguing shot.

Bart
 

John Harper

New member
John, I have never seen you post a bad shot. Your sandbagging aren't you? Great light, great balance and the color of the background matches perfectly. Did you change anything, or is that straight from the camera?

Hi Paul

Thank you for the kind words..... No its straight from the camera. The background is his baby sister out of focus and his fathers leg sat on the sofa.

This was in the days when i didn't shoot RAW just large JPG and only had my EOS 20D. The one thing i did do though when i first got into photography again in 2003 was to by the best lens i could afford (well not really afford... but what the hell) Its shot with the 70-200 2.8L IS. If i had to have only one lens that would be the one. Get a cheap camera but get the best glass you can.... And shoot lots of pictures law of averages says 1 of them will be in focus :)

John
 

John Harper

New member
Wonderful grab shot, great timing, overall beautiful color, and his expression is priceless.

I like it a lot because of his inquisitive look, although (and here comes the cheap critique) there are a few points that could be better if the opportunity would present itself again (which would unlikely offer the same 'look').

Things that could be improved (if it were a professional portrait, which it isn't, it's a great grab shot) are:
- skin color of the neck/collar-bone area looks too 'pale'/desaturated.
- it's generally a bad idea to have the main light on the cheek facing the camera, it can look like the subject has the mumps.
- A pitty that only one ear is visible with a shot that's almost 'en face'. It draws too much attention on the visible ear, also because of the light.

There are some things you could try, like a bit of selective/gradual darkening (starting from the cheek) of the ear and background, and perhaps slightly desaturating that area, and maybe adding a bit of blur. I didn't try it myself, but that's what I would try to see if it helps to de-emphasize the shortcomings. I might even try and add a hint of the other ear (mirrored, darker, and blurred), just a rim.

Just think of these comments as something my old teachers would have told me in portrait training class, suggestions to get better when you do have time and control. It's still a very intriguing shot.

Bart

Bart

Thank you for the pointers, i had never really looked at it that closely before, but i do see what you mean and i appreciate the comments.

I just try and capture shots that are in focus on the eyes and have the exposure somewhere near right.
I see so many friends have pictures from small digital or film cameras with direct flash, red eye and out of focus pictures, but by just shooting a shot thats crisp and clear and giving them a print them seem really happy.

I hope to get better at this whole digital photography creative side of things but if i can capture some memories for people thats all the thanks i need.

As you get older they become more precious, just wish i had realised that years ago

John
 
I just try and capture shots that are in focus on the eyes and have the exposure somewhere near right.

Ah, but you have more than that, in this case. You have caught (I repeat) a 'priceless' expression. I keep getting drawn into his look/ponderings, but I'm distracted a bit by (understandable) technical shortcomings.

Bart
 
Top