Frank Doorhof
Guest
As promised the ISO test.
I decided to do it this way because landscapes on ISO800 did not show enough noise to really show the difference.
So I parked my car in the shade and shot a serie of 100,400,800 handheld.
The crops here are in that order:
One thing I have to add.
The bumper on the Volvo shows structure, so in the ISO100 shot that is NOT noise.
Look at the logo and grill.
100, 400, 800
Crop 100
Crop 400
Crop 800
Although the 800 shows some noise (well actually alot of noise as expected), you have to remember that this is a 33MP back.
In other words when you show a 1:1 crop that would translate in a BIG print before it shows up.
I would without a doubt use 800 for prints up to A3 if I could not shoot on ISO400.
For the time being that concludes the review.
If there are ANY questions feel free to ask.
I decided to do it this way because landscapes on ISO800 did not show enough noise to really show the difference.
So I parked my car in the shade and shot a serie of 100,400,800 handheld.
The crops here are in that order:
One thing I have to add.
The bumper on the Volvo shows structure, so in the ISO100 shot that is NOT noise.
Look at the logo and grill.
100, 400, 800
Crop 100
Crop 400
Crop 800
Although the 800 shows some noise (well actually alot of noise as expected), you have to remember that this is a 33MP back.
In other words when you show a 1:1 crop that would translate in a BIG print before it shows up.
I would without a doubt use 800 for prints up to A3 if I could not shoot on ISO400.
For the time being that concludes the review.
If there are ANY questions feel free to ask.