Mark Schafer
pro member
Has anybody compared the two?
I'm very courious, i just got the Leica, Noise is somewhat horrible, at high ISO even unbearable.
The Flash even as a fill with people is unusable. It looks good on stills though.
And you have to work the camera with 2 hands all the time.
After day 2 i still have to shoot a frame thats actually perfectly in focus (granted,i keep playing with it while on the run, but managed city scapes shot at 1/320sec 3.2, wideangle).
I should mention that i'm used to Canon 1DS M2 and the files from the D-Lux that i'm seeing on my Eizo 21" are somewhat of a desaster (prints are good up to 8x10, start feeling plasticy above).
I'm not trying to flame Leica, but i'm used to the quality of M6/7, and being German i wish they would do best in breed...Should i go and get a Canon instead??
cheers
M
I'm very courious, i just got the Leica, Noise is somewhat horrible, at high ISO even unbearable.
The Flash even as a fill with people is unusable. It looks good on stills though.
And you have to work the camera with 2 hands all the time.
After day 2 i still have to shoot a frame thats actually perfectly in focus (granted,i keep playing with it while on the run, but managed city scapes shot at 1/320sec 3.2, wideangle).
I should mention that i'm used to Canon 1DS M2 and the files from the D-Lux that i'm seeing on my Eizo 21" are somewhat of a desaster (prints are good up to 8x10, start feeling plasticy above).
I'm not trying to flame Leica, but i'm used to the quality of M6/7, and being German i wish they would do best in breed...Should i go and get a Canon instead??
cheers
M