OK I get it now. This is a test isn't it? You are now just throwing up a snapshot to see who drools and fauns over it like it is an artistic masterpiece, right? Or is this an artistic masterpiece and I am just too crude and uncouth to realize it? It is definitely a far cry from your usual, creative and interesting images, at least to me, so I am a little disoriented.
James
James, I guess so!
Imants K is what he is. He throws something into a ring and then goes off leaving the dogs to sniff at it, bite of a piece and maybe get sick in the process. It's up to each dog, I guess to know what he's eating!
One can put perfume on a whore and a fine dress, send her to manners school but she is still what she is. So what's beautiful may not really be so wonderful. In the converse, all that looks shoddy may not be rubbish.
This picture shows a boy posing by a number of goats. A man behind him appears to notice something and perhaps it's what the boy was noticing too. None of the goats are imaged really. So what's this? Is it artistic? Is it just being annoying?
The boy is well placed but the image has no respect for the viewer, we are not faced with an agreeable image. We like the boy but not the secretive obscure manner of disclosing what's around him.
Is it brilliant, nonsense, a spoof on self-importance. I think all of the above!
Asher