Here, Sherif, I've imagined a purpose as you will see!
So here is what's delivered and it appears laid out as if for a page in a magazine or advertisement with added text or else a page to be included in a wedding album, perhaps. Let's exclude the latter and imagine this is for an ad or editorial.
Let's also make a fantastic jump and guess it's about "looking", (given the enlarged dim eye added on the left). In first glance it is pleasant and could fit the needs of catching attention and drawing the reader in to the text message or story.
If the story was about a 70% sale at Macy's or Bloomingdae's or Givenchy it would work but the add agency might be fired after that. But why?
We mutually accept many facial imperfections in people we like. However, we don't necessarily choose aberrant features to represent us or our fortunes. First let me state that women can look in the mirror for free to see oddities. In magazines they might prefer beauty, the fantasy of magical balance, perhaps of a kind they were bathed in as little girls.
So what bothers me here?
The face appears disassembled!
The natural god-given unity of the first picture has been torn apart by localized obvious photoshopping! Why magazines needs some plastic surgeons nose product, baffles me, but even then, it must fit in. Here, you have rendered the bridge of the nose to show an elegant and gentle highlight, but which stands out as a beacon! The left nostril is still dark and so appears plugged with death. The chin is softened to cause the eye to hover in confusion over it like a troubled helicopter trying to land. And then there's the one truth of the original that I find disturbing: oddly oblique fingernails that tip the well posed fingers!
This
one item really bothers me! Here would be a useful demonstration of retouching prowess, to make the nails both elegant
and fit into the picture. I could add the need to deal with the cracked dry lips, but that we might accept and even like since she then appears more vulnerable.
So, my overall opinion is that you have a lot of admirable skills and what's needed is the application for a defined purpose resulting in some "unity of being": no change calls attention to itself and the image, however fanciful and appears as natural as a flower that just opens.
Asher