• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

My World: Nature

Chris Calohan II

Well-known member
8630118036_7fa9e4ef2f_c.jpg


Sunning Commorant: Chris Calohan​
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Chris,

What a lucky fellow. Is that water near you. Just beautiful. And as for composition, the untidy left edge actually works fine! I would go over the edges and get rid of the sharpening, (or over-compressed jpg), halo.

Asher
 

Chris Calohan II

Well-known member
Thanks, Asher. It compressed oddly...but then I did change the way I sharpened on this one so may go back an iteration and redo. The full file .tiff is perfect. The water is about 80 feet outside my back gate.

I had to leave the left edge like that or the balance would have been awkward. Birds rarely situate themselves in a perfect pose or habitat..sometimes it really takes some work.
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Chris,

When I sharpen I do it on a duplicate layer and mask it, only allowing to show the inner portions while the sharpened edges get wiped with a 50% soft brush and that usually tames that halo. Also I always leave the picture and do something else and then try to decrease the contribution of any processed layer by anything from 3 tp 93 percent. I feel that blending in of even a tiny proportion of the original is best.

Still, if you sharpen according the protocols of Bart Van Der Wolf or Nicolas Claris, you won't have any halos to worry about!

Asher
 
Still, if you sharpen according the protocols of Bart Van Der Wolf or Nicolas Claris, you won't have any halos to worry about!

Chris, Asher,

There are no sharpening rules set in concrete, but there are a few recommendations that almost always deliver good results.

One of the principles is that one shouldn't over-sharpen (use a smaller radius instead), because that will lead to halo artifacts. Another one is that high contrast edges that already look sharp, require less sharpening.

Both of these principles can be satisfied by using a sharpening layer in Photoshop, with a luminosity blend-if layer. It will prevent halo clipping especially around high contrast edges, so you can boost the sharpening amount for lower contrast micro-detail. The following settings are a good starting point:

Non-clipped-sharpening.png

I use a Photoshop action that duplicates a layer, sets the layer blending mode as indicated above, and calls my preferred sharpening plugin (FocusMagic), although the Photoshop a Smart Sharpening filter can also be used. That produces a sharpening layer that can be masked, its overall opacity can be reduced, or it can be switched off when the image needs to be resampled to a different size. Lots of flexibility.

Cheers,
Bart
 
Last edited:

Chris Calohan II

Well-known member
8631546126_9af8a97327_c.jpg


Sunning Commorant: Chris Calohan​

It's not as bad and I may have to go back to the original file to get all the haloing out. Interesting way to sharpen, though. Thanks for the tip.
 

Jeff Donovan

New member
Saw several of these fishing as I was running around the Charles River yesterday. Just the head and neck would appear out of the water, look around, and down they went again.
 
Top