• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

On "full frame"

Doug Kerr

Well-known member
Many of you know that I have expressed disagreement with the use of "full frame" to mean a format (sensor) size of 36 mm x 24 mm, based on these premises:

• The term does not imply a specific format size without mention of the base film size involved (such as "full-frame 35-mm").

• The term is often used to suggest that this frame size is the ne plus ultra, the format size beyond which one need not aspire.

But upon reflection, I come to this position:

Assuming that we are clearly speaking in the context of a camera genre in which the cameras primarily use lenses from a family originally intended to support full-frame 35-mm cameras, or have strong design, historical, or evolutionary ties to such cameras, then "full frame" can be taken to mean:

The largest frame size ordinarily available within that genre

and as such (when we are clearly speaking in the context of that genre), is a reasonable moniker for the 36 mm x 24 mm frame size.

Obviously, we should not ask a fellow shooting a camera with a 56 mm x 56 mm frame if it performs a lot better than the full frame camera he used to use.
 
Top