Frank Doorhof
Guest
Two from today.
Greetings,
Frank
Greetings,
Frank
-
Please use real names.
Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed
Firstname Lastname
Register
We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know! -
Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!
Please turn arround and .... pose.
- Thread starter Frank Doorhof
- Start date
Doug Kerr
Well-known member
Hi, Frank,
And Asher was just talking a little while ago about your skill with curved surfaces!
And Asher was just talking a little while ago about your skill with curved surfaces!
Bill Miller
New member
What is the concept with these???? In #2 the left arm/elbow look wierd.
Frank Doorhof
Guest
What's wrong with you ?
You seem to be targeting my work with ridicolous questions lately ?
You seem to be targeting my work with ridicolous questions lately ?
Asher Kelman
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Hi Frank,
I also took a picture I love in which the left hand was partially hidden like that and I keep wanting to clone it back in. OTOH, it really doesn't matter.
I personally would prefer the pictures without the top which to me adds nothing. The red strings of the bikini are the special interest of the story. Then you would just have the beautiful back and no distraction to the whole landscape of form.
Bill? Don't worry about that, he's just himself.
Asher
I also took a picture I love in which the left hand was partially hidden like that and I keep wanting to clone it back in. OTOH, it really doesn't matter.
I personally would prefer the pictures without the top which to me adds nothing. The red strings of the bikini are the special interest of the story. Then you would just have the beautiful back and no distraction to the whole landscape of form.
Bill? Don't worry about that, he's just himself.
Asher
Frank Doorhof
Guest
well himself is ok, but I really don't get the targeting of my posts lately here and other forums, Bill knows me and is always considered a friend, it just puzzles me why he suddenly is targeting my work with questions that gives me the feeling he is trying to put me into a bad light (pun intended).
I have a preference for the more extreme posing and am inspired by the modern day Italian vogue, and other fashion mags, Bill knows this so it's strange he is targeting that area, also here with the concepts.
This has been going on for some time so it's not one post I understood incorrectly.
So I just wonder why....
I have a preference for the more extreme posing and am inspired by the modern day Italian vogue, and other fashion mags, Bill knows this so it's strange he is targeting that area, also here with the concepts.
This has been going on for some time so it's not one post I understood incorrectly.
So I just wonder why....
doug anderson
New member
Is there are rule that you have to see both hands? Isn't that a little...symmetrical? Besides, we all know what she's doing with her other hand. You can see it in the tension of her body. Heh.
Frank Doorhof
Guest
there are no rules, except that there are no rules 
Well.....
You should always cut of that it doesn't look like an ampute, however in modern day fashion you see some cuts and poses that border on the not humanly possible, it's a phase
Well.....
You should always cut of that it doesn't look like an ampute, however in modern day fashion you see some cuts and poses that border on the not humanly possible, it's a phase
Bill Miller
New member
Not a thing, as you know I speak my mind. You have said that the majority work you post is conceptual. So if the concept is not obvious then its a fair question to ask before giving any criticism of the photos. Regarding the above photos are they fashion or glamor? Is the emphasis on the clothes or the model?
If you feel the questions are ridiculous thats your opinion.
Frank Doorhof
Guest
Ok in that case, glamour.
Not for clothing.
Not for clothing.
Ian L. Sitren
pro member
Very well done!
I especially like the first one.
I especially like the first one.
Bart_van_der_Wolf
pro member
I agree. The allmost, but not quite (which in this case is positive), golden section placement of the 'garment' adds to the 'tension'.
Bart
fahim mohammed
Well-known member
chill out folks. more importantly, the title , pls turn around...why? i have no problem as presented.