Cedric MASSOULIER
New member
Hi,
Very nice those phantoms of the merry-go-round.
Cedric.
Very nice those phantoms of the merry-go-round.
Cedric.
Personally, I'm a mug for good sil shots because they offer the opportunity to leverage pure form and gesture, the two most powerful elements in 2-D imagery.
John,
If not for the feet, I'd have thought "There's a hand on the glass!"
Asher
After looking at the others pictures and enjoying the trip I have dug up one ... Main image was made in Glasgow - there is also an anti easter egg in there
man.walking.away - M Hampton
> besides the special beauty of the place, what is going on? What's with the chain and metal boxes and the fire?
Asher, that's lighting the torches for firedance on the beach of course.
- DL
.
seemed to add to the drama
cheers
Jérôme ,
So well measured in proportions. The sky is limited but a definite contribution to the success. It provides a roof that completes the picture. The sea is greater than the impressive hard rocks. That gives a sense of looking to the future. The tiny human figure provides the visual key to the immense size of the landscape. Also, it gives us a personal, albeit vicarious, view though that person. To the left, rocks tower over the person, providing asymmetry to counteract the otherwise, perhaps, unfitting central placement of the figure.
This has impact, uniqueness and despite it's modest size is so impressive.
Asher
Jérôme,
the isolation both of place and person that this image plays with in mind is reinforced by the shadow - in the left side.. nice cooling addition to this thread.
I am left wanting to ken more about this place/person..
cheers
Hold up - M Hampton
Mark,
This is neatly made. It's the movements and message that is so clear. The woman with her bag, (issues, burden, shopping, valuables) is vulnerable. The stranger points the way. This transcends the particular identities of the folk. Good job!
Asher
When I saw Jerome's picture, which I have enjoyed a lot, I have remembered this one of mine:
Into the sea
Hello!
The last few days I tried to do something different compared to my usual subjects.
These are sort of street shots, but the focus is not on recognizing something in the person itself, but more on the setting in general and the lighting. The bad quality is (partially) intended.
What do you see/think?
Best regards,
Michael
Hello!
The last few days I tried to do something different compared to my usual subjects.
These are sort of street shots, but the focus is not on recognizing something in the person itself, but more on the setting in general and the lighting. The bad quality is (partially) intended.
What do you see/think?
Hello!
The last few days I tried to do something different compared to my usual subjects.
These are sort of street shots, but the focus is not on recognizing something in the person itself, but more on the setting in general and the lighting. The bad quality is (partially) intended.
What do you see/think?