Antonio Correia
Well-known member
Ivan Garcia said:I know this picture, I saw it in a life book of 20th century photography when I was 8 years old, (god time does fly doesn’t it) this is a mother giving her child a bath, which is severely deformed due to mercury poisoning (if memory serves me right that is). I believe it is regarded as Smith’s finest work.
I think what Will is trying to say is, that you can use Art to illustrate barbarity, Goya’s “The Third of May 1808: The Execution of the Defenders of Madrid” springs to mind as another example.
I can’t agree with this particular spectacle, there is something fundamentally wrong with humans torturing animals as an expression of their art. Although, as you can see in my photographs, I agree with the use of Art to denounce Barbarism,
Now I understand the connection between Art and Barbarity. I mean, I understand what you are meaning...
But may be, there is a difference between an act of Barbarity expressly made - on purpose - and the documenting of an event after it happened and not meant.
I don't know if I made myself clear.
The Minamata tragedy - I knew it of course - is the translation on paper of something that happened.
It was not: It is going to happen so, let's take pictures (bullfighting).
It was: It happened so, lets take pictures (Minamata).
All this can produce works of Art if they are to be recognized by the Society.
On the other way there is a straight and strong connection between the essence of the picture and the picture itself.
There is also the problem of who proposes the photo: if it is a well known photographer or an anonymous one...