• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Upper Yosemite Falls, with Pine Trees

Mike Spinak

pro member
As requested, I'm showing some examples of landscape shots taken with extreme telephoto lenses.

This shot was taken with a 300 mm lens.

Upper Yosemite Falls, with Pine Trees
2143572171_573e5598fc_o.jpg

© Mike Spinak
 

Kathy Rappaport

pro member
Bridal Veil

Mike,

Beautiful image. One day I will visit Yosemite. Your work in landscapes and nature is quite stunning.

Hope the Bridal Veil shooting is going well for you too.
 

Cem_Usakligil

Well-known member
Hi Mike,

As I am about to retire for tonight, I'll just be brief in my reaction if you don't mind me for doing so.
Firstly, thanks for sharing those longer lens landscapes with us, much appreciated.

The picture is awesome. The very well placed tress at the bottom of the falls give the looker an immediate idea about the scale of the whole thing. And despite the compression of distances, the tress add another layer of depth. The rock surfaces at the left make the whole picture 3D.

Thanks for showing.
 

Mike Spinak

pro member
Mike,

Beautiful image. One day I will visit Yosemite. Your work in landscapes and nature is quite stunning.

Hope the Bridal Veil shooting is going well for you too.

Thanks, Kathy.

You should visit Yosemite. You live only a few hours away, and it's worth the trip.

I haven't been photographing any bridal veils, lately. ;) (I've been sidetracked, but will get back to it.) It seems like real veils aren't that popular, right now. Anyway, here's a bridal veil shot from last year:

504066149_cbfaa50620_o.jpg

© Mike Spinak

Speaking of bridal veils, I'll post a picture to the waterfall thread, later.
______________________________

Cem,

You are welcome. Perhaps I'll post a few more long lens landscapes, later.

Thank you for your kind words. I am pleased to hear that this picture seems to come across as I intended.
 

Mike Spinak

pro member
I'd guess I was about a mile and a half away.

I don't recall, but I would guess I focused on the waterfall, knowing that the depth of field would be wide enough for the wall behind, and the ridge in front.
 

Andrew Stannard

pro member
The trees make that image - without them it would be so hard to judge the scale of the falls (which is huge for someone living in the UK!).

Was it a conscious decision to position them directly over the fall, or were you limited by the viewpoint? Either way, it really works!


Cheers,
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Mike,

Of course it's awesome and the trees make it. The water too has both detail and milkyness. What aperture and speed?

In any case, exceptional work. Mike, as you know I appreciate the considerable thought invested long before you work the shutter!

Asher

Asher
 

Mike Spinak

pro member
Andrew,

It was quite intentional. As I say in the nature photography book I'm writing: "A composition’s elements are, optimally, observed and informed decisions, and are, at their worst, haphazard mistakes."

There are probably more than ten square miles of where I could've chosen to set up this shot. I wandered quite a bit to find spots that lined up sets of pines nicely in the foreground (both for scale and for the point of interest), as possible locations. (I also chose this general area by map and compass, based on how I wanted the light and shadow, and came back to the spot at the peak moment, to get the shot.) Besides lining them up, I had to wait for the right moment, when the waterfall was falling the way I wanted. (It constantly wanders a little, based on gusts of wind.) Also, I had to wait for the right moment, when the spray was falling over a wide area.

By the way, the trees in the Sierras are also bigger than in the UK, so the scale might yet be even bigger than you think. They're also somewhat closer than the waterfall. Anyway, the upper falls (visible in this picture) is 1,430 feet high; the entire waterfall is 2,425 feet high.
 

Andrew Stannard

pro member
Glad to hear that it was intentional. With my own landscape images I always get so much more satifaction out of a well planned , well thought out shot than one that 'happened to come out good'.

The scale figures are impressive! In England there are only 4 distinct peaks that reach above 3000ft from sea level and our highest waterfall is just over 200ft! Not that the UK isn't beautiful, but I must get to Yosemite one day.
 
Top