Antonio Correia
Well-known member
I presume he is upset !
There may be others ...
There may be others ...
I presume he is upset !
There may be others ...
Asher,
Just to let you know: As this opportuniti(es) have passed, I longer want to participate with my submitted pictures.
Please remove them from the portfolio for submission. I'll leave them in this thread for the moment for entertainment.
Thanks for the effort you put into this.
Best regards,
Michael
god. I can't believe I'm coming back to this thread.. I just had another photographer who was going to buy a print, refer back to this thread... and asked if I had copied you.
For the record.. I took a look at Fickr where one of your is posted.. Sept 18, 2011 it says as the capture date.. here's an image (should have full meta data, but can be provided if it doesn't follow this into the thread) that was taken on March 1 2010.
I left this thread (and the forum) because of this crap. I'm sorry.. but it goes way beyond rude and unprofessional to accuse someone you've never met, never had a conversation with, have no idea of their history or vision, of plagiarism. That is probably the worst insult another artist can say to another one.. and since it appears that I took this prior to yours, I'm not about to be ass enough to accuse you of copying me. (.. and as Asher has said.. many people have taken famous images of Half Dome.. and such).
As far as palette goes.. I've been doing Platinum over Pigment since 2001.. and this is really the only palette you get with that process
So.. get over yourself.. your work isn't original.. pretty much everything is derivative these days.
I did not accuse you of plagiarism, I felt accused of plagiarism myself. If you go back in this thread to page #3, I posted as an answer to a remark that our colour palette were similar: "For the record, I took my pictures and published them on this forum about 2 years before the thread from Jim Collum." I just meant to say that I could not have copied your pictures because I was not aware of them.
It now appears that we independently took visually similar pictures on separate continents and by completely different processes. To a certain extent, the similarity comes from the fact that fancy fairs look similar all over the planet. The similarity in colours may be explained that fancy fairs are painted in garish colours. I suppose that you figured out that the colours would be well suited to platinum prints. On my side, facing the output from digital captures, I decided to reduce color saturation and crush the blacks by digital processing.
I am so pleased that, at last, you realize the truth of the matter: coincidence of how independent photography of different fairs all over planet can appear to have similar odd colors!
god. I can't believe I'm coming back to this thread.. I just had another photographer who was going to buy a print, refer back to this thread... and asked if I had copied you.
I will with your permission, remove any references to this episode that might be a cause of misinterpretation.
Thanks Jerome,I have no problem with the removal in principle, but you will need to ask Jim as well. Moreover, the removal might be problematic in itself, as the info is known from at least a potential buyer and may be archived somewhere else.