Cem,
This picture, like many of yours is far more significant than the first casual glance would allow. It tells us a lot about ourselves, even though we may not have the tools to interpret each fully.
We ask for introductions, but that's not always the best way to present images. I disagree with the aphorism that "Art should speak for itself!" There are sometimes such unique benefits in knowing about what one is going to see, but also the opposite. In the former case one has the rich background to interpret best the signals embedded by the photographer and also the background of what's being imaged.
In the absence of such information, the artist donates only the image for our eyes and forces us to draw on knowledge of his/her previous works, the siblings which will sometimes inform us of the signals embedded and the circumstances of that artists work. Otherwise, we are left to muse with our library of cultural experiences to draw on and either wander in that new world, or else move on.
Cem Usakligil: Untitled #!!
Here, you allow the pictures to speak for themselves as they are the art of presumably unknown others.
Well, interestingly, you again included many realities. There are 3 significant paintings and the one seen from the side has been painted over a previous mural.
The first image has a man about to climb a drain pipe or posing next to it. He has a party hat or in the U.K. perhaps a dunce's hat. Maybe he's a European figure that's well known or perhaps the artist himself? Anyway, I have no idea what it might mean. The picture on the side of the house is obviously significant by it's colors and size but that's all one can say. At the back wall, there's an interesting cartoon figure. I have no familiarity with this but it seems to be a comic book or cartoon figure that I've seen before.
These pictures, together, show both the respect that one artist gives another, finding their own spaces and also the fact that, like civilizations or plants, one picture may replace another who's time is up!
Asher