Tim Dolan: Jordana & Hanna #2
The branch on the left is an important static masculine linear element. It serves as a counterweight to the two women and it’s fine and made up of “details@.
By contrast the forms of the women are soft and significant for curved feminine outline.
Absent are “details” to stop ones attention to the gestalt oneness of their femininity.
I don’t say “pose” as both these images show nothing static, but a fluidity of form made of smoothness!
Tim Dolan: Jordana & Hanna #1
Of course someone might ask about the ability to resolve the hair, grains of sand or details in the water. Fair questions. It’s feasible that there’s an enormous reserve of detail to be discovered in the RAW images of a 1Ds Mark III.
However, I would assure the most finicky person that these concerns are just for flavors of output on a printer just as sharpening, vignettes or other diverse adjustments might seem fitting for that month’s print. Anyway, next year you might print it differently anyway.
What’s most important is that none of that fussing does any more than add flavor to an already successful set of winning pictures!
Kudos!
Very simple, deceivingly “ordinary” ideas but superbly executed with restraint, no flamboyance and here are wonderful moments you conjured up, that are believable and ones I would be proud of!
...and the models didn’t ruin your dreams, but realized then!
Asher