Michael,
You say it's lost its importance. Must be!
I tried in vain to use Yahoo and Google search what was its fame about, but got nothing at all!
So why was it significant? Was this some passport office, and who was that "Karl Sturm"?
If a picture "must speak for itself", then what censors its speech? But, likely as not, a picture, "Speaking for itself" means something different than "explaining".
Certainlyvthe doorway seems important and significant but what was its part in life at the time when it was most active?
Asher
Asher,
A door with a well-ornamented doorframe that sports a broken doorsill and obvious signs of neglect has certainly no longer the importance in had before as an access to building or like here to a garden. Otherwise someone would have cared to repair and maintain the door better.
Why does it have to be something specifically significant for you? When did you lose the ability to look for the simple, obvious things first?
Does it need that much of an explanation for you?
Michael,
These are good points you make, yes, of course I could examine "what is". And yes, you are correct that we should be satisfied with what is given.
{picture removed for readability}
There! That is one fine facade. So what made the folk put in this effort?
I think that, likely as not, you happen to know enough of what justified such an investment in materials and effort. This is not trivial information but also culturally significant. This is, after all, something usual with it's own stories.
What it "is", in ordinary things, (when. it's merely the type of "paint on a canvas", concrete in a hydroelectric dam or wire in a transformer,) is not expected to be described. For these, we have prior konwledge.
Here, however, we have something unique that was once "alive, so to speak. It was a part of an especially designed and motivated structure. It, no doubt, played a role in the society at the time.
Imagine, approaching a war memorial, statue of Winston Churlil or the Gravestones in Gallipoli and only study on the lightin and patina of the granite? Doing so would ignore the humanity integral to these structures.
The camera can serve not merely to document the door, but also to serve as a lanturn to illuminiate our culture.
So yes, for this photograph invites interest just by itself. Thati s granted and much appreciated.
Still, in such circumstances, the experience it evokes can be increased exponentially by knowing of its planning and changing role during its active life.
After all, Michael, does one one describe a dead person? We do not focus on the texture of his skin, lifeless as it is, but we do relate to the place he served in his community. Why does the your interesting but dead door, deserve less?
I just happen to value any generosity and kindness in sharing the extra and so fundamental information.
Thanks,
Asher
So basically four you a picture cannot serve as a metaphor, even less when signs writings are involved in the picture.
What would Winston Churchill have to to with a door somewhere in Bavaria?
My point is that explanations can be nice but do not necessarily increase the impact of the picture.
Best regards
Michael
Michael,
Of course anything can serve as a metaphor, that's how all language is built. Even words like, "to" or "up" are metaphors. From my photography, comments, you must have recognized that looking for metaphors is one of my constants in an appreciative feedback.
I have not diminished in anyway, the impact of what "is" in the picture in my request for what "was" the doorways representing in its glory.
In this case, the door is not ordinary, it''s not. mundane but is part of some local history that is significanty. You seem to be saying the sum of its worth is is waht we see.
I beleive that what we do not see also is part of its value and complements what survives now.
If in spite of my interest your view is fixed, then that is what it is, like me being refused pastries in Munich during lunch time, as they do not serve pastries during lunchtime and that is what they do and dont do!
I appreciate that at least we see the interesting door. That I alreadylike. I am sorry that dislosing more goes against some rule or principal, so never mind.
asher
Asher
There is no rule. It is just that your question(s) you ask me quite often would spawn research work every time to satisfy your need for information when I did not see the necessity to search further. Do you have that little respect for the time of other people? Did you even consider the possibility?
Michael
To satisfy your curiosity - it was the garden of this brewery, belonging to this monastery until 1879 when it changed into private hands (Karl Sturm) in this small town in Lower Bavaria. The brewery moved.
Town hall door in Freising:
No Asher, these shots are all from the outside...
...
The director was in LA in 2015 at our exhibition at Photo Contemporary and loved the work of Antonio Correia but didn't buy anything ! Asher
A lot of character in those old doors.
"Cruz Roja".
Damn tough and serious neighborhood!
Wonderful folk who serve inside!
In the USA the organization is very corrupt. It has become like a magachurchvwherevtge contracts and reirement reserves for the bureaucrats takes precedence in their financial allocations from short term relief to strategic long term allocations.
So after plane hijacking on 9/11 and the twin towers destruction in NY, when $$millions flowed in, scant relief was actually offered to any victims/families as it was needed for “essential reserves” to cover existing commitments for executive payout plans!
I imagine that local folk are much more concerned with the actual relief programs than job security!
Very brave and noble people!
Asher